Saturday, March 31, 2007

Videoblog Message From Doug Kenline To Ed And Elaine Brown

Doug talks about how he thinks it would be a good thing for Ed and Elaine Brown to do daily videoblog reports for the people.

Watch video here.

Dick and Jane learn about IRS

By Bill Price

Look Jane! Daddy is sad, sad, sad. Why is Daddy so sad, Dick? He got a summons and complaint from the court. What is a summons? Mr. Lee, the mailman told Mommy it is a warning that you must answer a complaint in 20 days or less. What would happen if Daddy did not answer? Daddy said that the IRS will take away our house! Where will we live, Dick? Maybe we will live outside in the park with the birds and bees. Maybe Spot will scare the mean people away when they try to take our house. Yes, Spot will bite mean people!

What is a complaint? Daddy said a complaint is a lawsuit. What does that mean? Daddy said that means that people from the Department of Justice think Daddy is a bad, bad, bad man! He is not bad! Daddy told Mommy that the Justice people and the IRS say that he owes tax, tax, tax and that he must pay much, much more of his money to the IRS. Why does he have to pay much of his money? The IRS people say there is an income tax law that says you must pay a lot of your money to them or the Justice people can put you in jail. That is mean! Who would take care of us, Dick? I don’t know!

Dick, is there a law that says Daddy must pay much of his money to the IRS? No, Jane, Daddy says that there is no law like that, but they made up the story to fool people with. The IRS says regulations can make workers pay, pay, pay. What are regulations? I guess they are words that make people do things. Is there a regulation that makes Daddy pay his money to the IRS? Jane, Daddy told Mommy that the Justice people and the IRS told the judge that a regulation was made for Daddy. Was there? No! No! No! They told the judge that there is a regulation that says Daddy is a government worker. No! No! No! Daddy is a handyman! I know, but the Justice people and the IRS say Daddy is a government worker. They are lying! They are bad people!

Dick, the judge will help Daddy. Jane, Mommy said that most of the judges like the Justice people lie about the pretend law. Remember the Justice people and the IRS made up a story about a law that makes Daddy pay. Why doesn’t Daddy make the justice people show him the law? Daddy said that the judge helps the bad people fool workers by pretending about a law. The judge is scared of the IRS people. Dick, what is the IRS? Daddy says that it is the Internal Revenue Service. What does that mean? Daddy says they are tax collectors that like to take much of the workers money away. Why? I do not know, but Mommy said we cannot go on summer trips any more! She will have to get a job like Daddy to pay, pay, pay the IRS people. Wow! Daddy said the regulation story is make-believe because only a law can give power to a regulation and there is no law like that. Mighty Mouse has power and he would fight those bad IRS people. Jane, I heard the milkman tell Johnny’s Daddy and Mommy that Daddy is a mouse and he will get squashed by the judge, the IRS and the Justice people because they all sing in a choir. Do they? I don’t know, maybe.

Dick let’s tell everyone we know in school, at show and tell, and at Susie’s birthday party tomorrow about the bad people. Yes, like the IRS and the scaredy cat judges and the lying Justice people. Tell them not to listen to their choir when they sing. Yea, when all the other kids hear it they will tell their parents. The bad people will have to hide. Jane, do you think the bad people say the Pledge of Allegiance like we do at school? If they do God will be so mad at them. Why? Because they are lying. Daddy and Mommy said that the truth has the most power. So, we can stay in our own house with Spot. That’s how we will make the bad people go away when they come. We will tell the truth. The End.

Bill Price


Freedom to Fascism, an Orwellian Odyssey

“Come writers and critics who prophesize with your pen – keep your eyes open wide this chance won’t come again – and don’t speak too soon for the wheel is still in spin, and there’s no telling who it will be naming …. for the times they are a changing…” Bob Dylan 1964.

Lately some writers and critics have tried to forewarn the middle class of the coming crisis. Pat Buchanan’s effort to sound the alarm against NAFTA, GATT and the WTO, is a recent example. The media conglomerates have shown time and again just how easily they can manage such forays into the public consciousness. The wheel of fate alluded to in Dylan’s song has come to rest. Names have been named, places revealed, dates are now known and the future then, now occupies its place in history.

George Orwell would have been pleased to see this day in America. Orwell’s novels “Animal Farm” and “1984” predicted a state of totalitarianism in the world. Regrettably, Orwell did not live to see the phenomena you are about to witness. The movie “America, Freedom to Fascism” is an expose’ on the Federal Income Tax, the Federal Reserve Banking/system and finally the facts about an international cartel that has been very busy “arranging” your entire future. It is more powerful than anything you have seen. Ironically, these world planners featured in Aaron Russo’s movie, have something in common with George Orwell, their most notable critic. The cartel’s global plan for the middle class, and the title of Mr. Orwell’s most famous book, could very well share the same name, “Animal Farm”

“Animal Farm” released in 1945 was an ominous warning to the world. There was another ominous release that year, the atomic bombs over Nagasaki and Hiroshima. “Freedom to Fascism” was released in 2006 and with it, something even more powerful than the atomic bomb, the truth.

“Gather round people wherever you roam, and admit that the waters around you have grown - so you better start swimming or you’ll sink like a stone, if to you your time is worth saving, for the times they are a changing…”

Is our time worth saving? Spread the word, by using the most powerful weapon known to man, the truth. Watch and share “America, Freedom to Fascism”.

“Keep your eyes open wide this chance won’t come again…for the times they are a changing...”

This introduction was prepared by Bill Price. The producer and director of “America, Freedom to Fascism”, Aaron Russo does not necessarily endorse the views expressed herein. For additional information on the federal income tax, visit www.article1-taxation.com

Friday, March 30, 2007

Today's Ed Brown RBN Radio Show Now Posted Online



Ed Brown Under Siege

In today's show Fred Smart calls in live from Washington D.C. on the bus carrying all the V's to the silent vigil in front of the white house.

Today's Ed Brown RBN radio show now on-line at the RBN Radio Archives.

Listen to today's Ed Brown RBN Radio Show here.

What will you do if the Feds raid Ed Brown?

As many of you may be aware, Washington is thought to be under some pressure to have tax protesters Ed and Elaine Brown in the courthouse for their sentencing April 24. The Plainfield, New Hampshire couple have been holed up in their house since their convicition on tax charges in Januray. Ed is carrying a .45 and has promised to fire upon any government agent attempting to arrest him or his wife. Ed's not perfect, but at least he's taking a stand and hasn't harmed anyone.

I'm told it will be an a very unusual ocurrance if they are sentenced in absentia. On the other hand, authorities have repeatedly stated they will not initiate an armed confrontation.

In any case we should be especially ready for the possibility of a raid sometime in the next few weeks, and we should each be considering what we are going to do if it ocurrs. I tend to think that the best things to do are those which we do on our own iniatiative, and which are telegraphed to the authorities in advance. However if you are just hunting around for ideas, or you don't have all the information you need to carry out some type of response...This post should assist you even if you're outside New Hampshire.

Read more from David Ridley here.

Modern Day Book Burning & Gestapo Tactics

Larken Rose is the young fellow who researched and made the video "Theft by Deception", which is available on the internet (I've referred everyone to it before). According to him, some time ago he, his wife, and their young daughter were subjected to an IRS "raid" on their home---armed men burst in yelling and pointing weapons, proceeded to rummage through all their belongings, and seized about 200-300 copies of his video. The same thing happened to his producer (and family). It should be added that Rose has not paid the Individual Income Tax for about ten years, and has dared the IRS to "show me [him] the law" and charge him with any "crime".

individualsovereignty.blogspot.com

Ed and Elaine Brown Live on Republic Broadcasting Today at 2 PM ET



Today Fred Smart will be calling in live from the We The People Conference in Washington D.C.

Listen live to Ed and Elaine Brown on RBN Republic Broadcast Network today at 2 PM ET.

Click here to listen live at 2 PM ET.

Audioblog Report From David Ridley

powered by Audioblog.com




MP3 File

We The People Foundation and Congress



Will assemble peacefully across from the White House, Washington, D.C.

Friday March 30,2007 at 3:00

Most assemblers will be dressed as the Character V from the film

V for Vendetta

This assembly will be out of concern for the rights Americans are loosing daily

And for the fear most Americans feel to freely express themselves.

Please let Americans everywhere, including overseas know that

Americans are not happy with our Constitution being trampled on.

These V's will be awaiting a response from the President

Nor are we happy with the current Foreign Policy.

We the People has presented several “Petitions for Redress”

To the Federal Government.

We the People will be awaiting a response from the President for these Petitions in front of the White House!

Will they respond?

If we cannot receive a response from the government, where to we go with grievances?

At the last assembly, We the People received national and international attention.

See www.givemeliberty.org for further details.

The Judge Wapner Solution

By Bill Price

Remember Judge Wapner? He would begin each case with “I’ve read your complaint, and I know you have been sworn.” Wapner knew that a valid complaint will: 1) sufficiently create a controversy through the pleadings of (a dispute over “damages” or allegations concerning a broken law) and 2) will be attested to by a witness (someone with firsthand knowledge). If either of these two things were missing, jurisdiction was not conferred. Wapner wouldn’t deviate. Judge Wapner reminded everyone before he heard a case that the paramount issue of jurisdiction had been satisfied and he could now proceed. He knew when jurisdiction was conferred. When a judge does not follow this model, he’s only impersonating a judge. It takes a controversy (damage or broken law) and a witness (someone with firsthand knowledge) before any judge can act.

Well, that’s the solution to alleviating our court’s clogged dockets. Apply Judge Wapner’s precedence law model for conferring jurisdiction and “poof!”, thousands of backlogged cases brought into these U.S. District courts by the Department of “Justice”, will instantly vanish, like Ed and Elaine Brown’s, Chuck Conces’s, etc….

“… As we have said of other unsworn statements which were not part of the record and therefore could not have been considered by the trial court: "Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in the disposition of [a] case." Adickes v. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 -158, n. 16

"Jurisdiction means the power of a court to hear and determine a cause, which power is conferred by a constitution or a statute, or both." Penn v. Com. 528 S.E.2d 179, 32 Va.App. 422 (2000)

Judge Wapner was a Patriot. The above precedence law was faithfully carried out by the good Judge. At the end of the oath for Judges it states:
“I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all duties incumbent on me as ____ under the Constitution and the laws of the United States. So help me God.” If someone could show me a clone of Judge Wapner I will immediately reconsider my position on that issue.

“The judicial power in the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court and in such inferior Courts as the Congress shall from time to time establish and ordain…The Judges, both of the Supreme and inferior courts shall hold their offices during good behavior...” U.S. Constitution Article III § 1

The Nut in a Nutshell

We know that a judge cannot be on good behavior if he ignores precedence law (Supreme Court Rulings) or proceeds without jurisdiction. Remember Judge Wapner’s model. It doesn’t matter how big a judge’s gavel is, or type of flag in the courtroom (although today in American courtrooms a flag featuring a big kangaroo should appropriately replace the stars and strips). The following is a typical sequence in the post Wapner era and illustrated by Judge Quist. Quist presumably reads and accepts a complaint from the DOJ titled United States v Charles Conces, without verifying first if DOJ attorney Michael Raum has statutory authority to commence a civil action against the Defendant, Conces, under (IRC 7401). Then the kangaroo complaint filed by the DOJ provides no sworn statements, not a problem for Judge “Q”. All of Raum’s averments are unsworn, as Raum has no firsthand knowledge to support his allegations. Raum presents no witnesses with his/government’s pleadings. So he lies. Judge “Q” knows of the fraud and winks at the DOJ. To date, the United States has produced no witnesses against Conces and is torturing him with prison food until he manufactures a “witness list” against himself. It sounds like Guantanamo Bay to me.

Fifteen Minutes with Chuck Conces, Monday, March 26, 2:24 pm

This call is being monitored, said the recording. You have 15 minutes if you choose to accept the charges. To accept, say yes or press one. Yes, I accept the charges. Hello, Chuck? How are ya, Bill? Good, how about you? I doing fine, the food isn’t though, ha, ha. How’s work, Bill? Picking up a bit, I need to put more time in, but that’s another problem. Let’s get to it…we only have 14 minutes left. Mary has made six copies of my appeal and is mailing the original to Cincinnati. I believe she is on her way to the court right now to pay the appeal fee. Twenty two pages, handwritten. No kidding? Yeah, no kidding! I want you to thank those guys for preparing and sending that Writ of Habeas Corpus to me. Without it I wouldn’t have been able to cite many of those Court Rulings. It was a real lifesaver. I’ll pass that on Chuck. I’m appealing on six issues. First issue is the Supreme Court cases that have been violated by the DOJ and Judge Quist. You have one minute remaining. I spent the majority of the time listening to Chuck talk about his appeal. You have 30 seconds… Well, we’re going to have to end it, so give my best to everyone. I’ll talk to you latter Chuck.

Chuck needs to temporarily suspend his appeal and sign the Writ of Habeas Corpus, effectively taking away the court’s objections to the writ. So, in your letters, give the Lawman some advice, get back to the writ of Habeas Corpus, Lawman, and fillabuster Judge “Q” and or the substitute magistrate at your hearing.


Bill Price

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Today's Ed Brown RBN Radio Show Now Posted Online



Ed Brown Under Siege

Today's Ed Brown RBN radio show now on-line at the RBN Radio Archives.

Listen to today's Ed Brown RBN Radio Show here.

Irwin Schiff Posts New Material To His Website

We The People Conference Starts Today



Fred Smart calling in live from the WTP Conference in Washington D.C. today on the Ed Brown RBN Radio Show.

Listen live here.

Vote For Ron Paul In Online Poll



Thank you to the anonymous tipster who informed me via e-mail that Ron Paul is back on the Pajamas Media straw poll. And of course, he is is winning. So take a second, if you haven't already, to click over there and express your opinion: http://pajamasmedia.com/ Look for the straw poll, and vote.

Read more and vote at Daily Paul.

Ed and Elaine Brown Live on Republic Broadcasting Today at 2 PM ET



Today Fred Smart is calling in live from the We The People Conference in Washington D.C.

Listen live to Ed and Elaine Brown on RBN Republic Broadcast Network today at 2 PM ET.

Click here to listen live at 2 PM ET.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Today's Ed Brown RBN Radio Show Now Posted Online



Ed Brown Under Siege

Today's Ed Brown RBN radio show now on-line at the RBN Radio Archives.

Listen to today's Ed Brown RBN Radio Show here.

Ron Paul YouTube Channel

Ed and Elaine Brown Live on Republic Broadcasting Today at 2 PM ET



Today's guest is Bill Price friend of Chuck Conces who is being held in jail at this time.

Listen live to Ed and Elaine Brown on RBN Republic Broadcast Network today at 2 PM ET.

Click here to listen live at 2 PM ET.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Report from Bob Schulz



Federal Reserve: Hiding 9-11 Evidence?

Reporter and Fed Analyst To Speak at GML 2007

Give Me Liberty 2007 conference starts Thursday morning, March 29.


Last Friday, we noticed a news item that was picked up by the on-line news service, Freedom’s Phoenix Headline News out of Phoenix, Arizona.

The news story was titled, “Former Fed analyst questions M1 currency component spike prior to 9/11,” and was originally published on March 22 in the Muckraker Report.

The story is about William Bergman a senior analyst at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago whose employment with the Bank was abruptly terminated after he sought answers to a question relating to an investigation he had been directed to undertake.


Read more here.

Aaron Russo - Mad As Hell



Note: This was just uploaded to googlevideo.com on March 21st.

SPP.gov Now Back Online

It was mentioned in today's radio show that this government website was not available. Apparently it is back online at this time.

http://www.spp.gov/

Today's Ed Brown RBN Radio Show Now Online

One of the guests on today's Ed Brown RBN radio show was the owner of this site...

www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com

The other guest was the owner of this site...

www.nacleaders.org

Listen to today's show here.

Audio Moblog

powered by Audioblog.com




MP3 File

Audio Moblog

powered by Audioblog.com




MP3 File

Monday, March 26, 2007

Judge, Jury and Excutioner all for $19.99

By Bill Price

Your Honor, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38: Jury Trial of Right (a) Right Preserved states:
“The right of trial by jury as declared by the seventh Amendment to the Constitution or as given by statute of the United States shall be preserved to the parties inviolate.”

The Defense will now call Mr. Webster to the stand. Mr. Webster do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God? “I do”. Mr. Webster, can you tell the Court and this distinguished jury what the definition of the word inviolate is?”

Answer: “Not violable; too sacred to suffer or be allowed to suffer violation …unimpaired; unbroken; as a custom kept inviolate”.

In your unabridged opinion, do you think this word has any meaning that would substantially deviate from that which you have stated? “No, I do not!” Thank you, Mr. Webster. That will be all for now, you can step down now sir.

Your Honor, members of the jury, the Plaintiff (DOJ), has charged the Defendant with causing great harm to these United States. Included in the Justice Department’s averments against Charles F. Conces, is Conces’s alleged interference with the government’s ability to collect income taxes. A very serious charge! Defendant, Conces, denies these allegations and has demanded a jury trial as his inviolate right under FRCP 38 and the 7th Amendment to the U.S Constitution. What will your verdict be, ladies and gentleman of the jury? Is the Defendant, Charles F. Conces, entitled to a trial by jury? Judge Quist disputes the Defendant’s constitutional rights and has proclaimed, on the authority vested in his Inferior District court for the Western District of Michigan that Conces shall not be afforded any benefit from Federal Rule 38, or the 7th Amendment: “… where controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of a jury trial shall be preserved…”

Members of the jury, you have heard from the Rules of Civil Procedure. You have heard from the 7th Amendment. You have heard Mr. Webster’s testimony and finally you have heard the Defendant’s own denials of the government’s allegations. It appears that the Hon. Quist’s unverified estimate of the damage in controversy is the only impediment to a trial by jury for the Defendant Conces. Judge Gordon J. Quist has stated for the record that the United States has suffered $19.99 or less in damages. Ladies and gentlemen, STOP… this is a serious matter…not a time for laughter… Will your Honor please bring the court to order? Who threw that pie at judge Quist? No more raspberries from the audience and get those whoopee cushions out of here!

Back to Reality

Our government is spending big dollars on these cases like the case against Brown’s in Concord. In the Conces case, Four or five U.S Attorneys, a Magistrate judge, (Ellen Carmondy) clerks, court reporters, U.S. Marshals, County Jail personnel etc. etc. Wait till the media finds about this ridiculous waste of money and manpower. Will Judge Quist ever be in trouble? When you’re done laughing consider this… what will happen if the people find out? Now, that’s no laughing matter. The Conces case is just one of thousands. People react to gross and prolonged injustice differently. The Italians demonstrated this with Benito Mussolini after WWII. The people had reached their limit; the fascist dictator was left hanging upside down for all to see after he was beaten to death by the public. I never read about any indictments for the brutal beating and the gruesome public demonstration of Mussolini‘s battered body. In Germany the judges were put on trial for crimes against humanity as a more civilized public reaction. (Watch “JUDGEMENT AT NUREMBURG”. One of the best movies you will ever see).

I see judges all over this land committing crimes against humanity.

Charles F. Conces has been deprived of his liberty for a full month for $19.99 worth of damage. We the people find the actions of Judge Gordon J. Quist, U.S. District Judge in the Western District of Michigan of Michigan to be totally outside of the conduct outlined in the Code of Conduct for federal judges. Gordon Quist is a renegade impersonating a federal judge. I’m sure the judges in Rome thought things would never change, too.

When and if a jury is seated in the civil action of the United States v. Charles F. Conces, they will eventually discover something very troubling. There is no delegation order evoking the statute necessary for filing a civil suit against Defendant, Conces.

“There was no violation, because there was no civil lawsuit. There was no lawsuit because there was no Authorization to commence.”

IRC Sec.7401; AUTHORIZATION: “No civil action for the collection or recovery of taxes, or of any fine, penalty or forfeiture, shall be commenced unless the secretary (of the Treasury) authorizes the proceedings and the Attorney General or his delegate directs that the action be commenced.”

I have a suggestion. Let’s quit fooling ourselves with hopes of new procedures. They are not going to fix this problem. I went to my first Lawman meeting in several months and I heard people talking about new “procedures”, 100%, the silver bullet. Now I’m hearing about a new lawyer. I’m sure he’s a great guy. Most people willing to get involved usually are. I wish him well, but wake up folks. If he prevails it will be for one of three reasons… an enlightened jury, the judge hearing his case is not in the club, or we are approaching the threshold of public awareness and are finally having an effect. The judicial system in this country has been hijacked. Criminals like Judge Bell, Judge McKeague, Judge Quist Judge Dawson ect. etc., are not going to change because of new procedures or a new lawyer comes to town. These judges went over to the dark side sometime ago. I don’t know about your district, but the Western District of Michigan is a good place to avoid for pro se litigants.

I’m attaching one of the certified letters I sent to the Congressional Judiciary committee Chairman, the Hon, Sensenbrenner. Mr. Sensenbrenner never replied to my letters, thus committing an act of fraud through silence. Along with the attached letter, I included exhibits “A”, “C” and “D”, which were letters from Internal Revenue Disclosure Officers Gregory Turner, of Detroit, and Lisa Spinks, of Seattle. Both of these disclosure officers stated that they had conducted searches for an employee named Stephen P. Warner. “Mr. Warner” had sent my employer Ford motor Company a letter on IRS stationary instructing Ford to levy my wages. Ford complied. As it turned out “Mr. Stephen P. Warner” is not an employee of the Internal Revenue Service. Judge Bell’s denial was predicated on FRCP 60 (b) 3 and 4. Bell stated that his hands were tied. He couldn’t consider this new evidence because it was not reported within a year of his previous judgment against me. That’s right, Bell, but you forgetting something: “Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda, 384 US 436, at 491.

“Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments” U.S. V. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61.
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are provided by the U.S. Supreme Court and are essential to a litigant’s due process when in the judicial arena. They are a necessary guide and allow for orderly procedure, but they are not law. This is why Decisional Law or Case Law, such as the above Supreme Court rulings do not have to compete with court rules in our Inferior courts. These rules are being used to trump Supreme Court rulings. Mr. Bell and his colleague’s perniciously use court rules as traps to interfere with a litigant’s Constitutional rights. Mr. Bell is an imposter. There is no Chief Judge for the Western District of Michigan. Bell is a felon, not a judge. Read the Hon. Bell’s rap sheet below.

Our most important job right now is to warn the public…The judges are coming, the judges are coming!!!

Bill Price




Michigan Lawman Committee for the Public Interest
State Chairman, William M. Price National Chairman, Charles F. Conces
4406 Oakely Rd., Stockbridge, Mich. 49285 9523 Pine Hill Dr., Battle Creek, Mi. 49017

Wayne County Wayne County Wayne County Ingham County Oakland County
Harold H. Dunn David Nagy Patricia MacGillivray Stephen C. Caviness David Norris

September 12, 2005





Chairman Sensenbrenner:


My Congressman Mike Rogers asked you as the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, to investigate my report of crime regarding U.S. District Court Judge Robert Holmes Bell, chief judge for the Western District of Michigan. Congressman Rogers stated to me that he forwarded my letter to you with a request that you investigate the claims made in my report, and included a copy of such request with his response to me.

Actually, I wrote two letters to Congressman Rogers. Since the Hon. Rogers did not specify which letter he forwarded I am providing you with both letters. The letter of July 8, 2005, which I presume was the letter sent to you, dealt exclusively with Judge Bell’s criminal actions. The letter of August 11, 2005, was devoted only in part to Judge Bell.

Congressman Sensenbrenner, I will do whatever I can to expedite the investigation into our allegations of Judge Bell’s felonious activity. Judge Bell perjured his oath, violated the code of conduct for U.S. Judges, deliberately misapplied Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, ignored precedence law, granted favorable treatment to influential parties and committed other felonious acts such as fraud, acceding to fraud, accessory after the fact and conspiracy.

The Hon. Bell refused to allow Discovery in my cases as well as in other cases that I am personally aware of. Others in our public interest group received similar treatment from the Hon Bell and are ready to testify to the facts in their cases. The primary reason for my rule 60(b) motion referred to in my July 8, letter (See the enclosed letter of July 8th) was that new evidence was discovered showing that fraud had been perpetrated on Judge Bell’s court by the Defendant, Ford Motor Company. Under FRCP 60(b) 2 and 3 relief from judgment can be sought by a party when new evidence or fraud is discovered.

As you already know, “Discovery” provides the means by which litigants exchange information, thus preventing judgments made in absence of knowable facts. Without Discovery the party in possession and control of crucial documents, data and compilations could easily control the outcome of a court case. That is why the Supreme Court when writing the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure wrote the following:

FRCP Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of disclosure
(a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter.
(1) Initial Disclosures. Except in categories of proceedings specified in Rule 26(a)(1)(E) or to the extent otherwise stipulated or directed by order, a party must, without awaiting discovery request, provide to the other parties:
(B) a copy of, or a description by category and location of, all documents, data compilations, and tangible things that are in the possession, custody, or control of the party and that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses, unless solely for impeachment.

“If discovery could uncover one or more substantial factual issues, plaintiff was entitled to reasonable discovery to do so prior to district court’s granting of motion for summary judgment. Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. Rule 56 (e), 28 U.S.C.A.” Williamson v.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 815F. 368 (5th Cir. 1987).

(For the sake of clarity, the writer of this letter, William M. Price, from this point forward will be referred to as “the Plaintiff”).

An impartial judge would have demanded that the parties fulfill their obligations to disclose under FRCP 26. Judge Bell not only failed to carry out his duty in this regard, he actively interfered with the Discovery process in Plaintiff’s case (#5:03 CV-0106) by denying Plaintiff’s MOTION FOR PERIOD OF ENLARGEMENT. The Plaintiff filed that motion in order to temporarily delay the Court’s decision concerning the Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint, at least until, “all the documents, data, compilations, and tangible things that are in the possession, custody, or control of the party and that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses,...” had been exchanged according to Rule 26.

Judge Bell failed to demand that the Defendant (Ford Motor Company) disclose, knowing that the Plaintiff, William M. Price, would be deprived of crucial evidence. The Plaintiff’s complaint and exhibits alleged that the Defendant was concealing evidence of its wrongdoing by refusing to reveal pertinent documentation. It is now known that Judge Bell allowed the Defendant to continue its concealment of a fraudulent document. Exposure of the fraudulent document, known to be under the Defendant’s possession and control would have, for reasons of fraud, forced an immediate end to the proceedings. Judge Bell knowingly and maliciously denied the Plaintiff’s Due Process through manipulation of court rules in order to favor the Defendant. The Hon. Bell routinely deprives litigants of their due process in this way. Other members of our public interest group are ready to testify concerning Bell’s actions in this regard. I call your attention to the following Supreme Court ruling:

“Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda, 384 US 436, at 491.

The record clearly shows that in case (5:03 CV- 0106), the Hon. Bell aided the Defendant in concealing a fraudulent document and then refused to acknowledge that document when such was presented to the Hon. Bell approximately a year and a half later, in the Plaintiff’s MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT according to Rule 60 (b) 2 and 3. Chairman Sensenbrenner, through the Plaintiff’s own investigative effort, the fraudulent document was finally produced. It took over a year to procure said document (See the attached exhibits “A”, “C”, and “D”). Judge Bell then selectively used a stipulation in a court rule to thwart this Pro-Se Plaintiff’s effort at gaining justice by denying the Plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion for relief from judgment, thus rejecting the accompanying evidence in exhibits “A”, “C”, and “D”, and stating that such motion and evidence of fraud was frivolous: “Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment is utterly frivolous…Motions under rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonable time…furthermore, it is completely without merit”

Judge Bell’s ruling in case (5:03 CV 0106) directly contradicts the U.S. Supreme Court:

“Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments” U.S. V. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61.

“Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters” Nudd V. Burrows, 91 U.S. 426.

Mr. Chairman you will not need to rely on my statements or Judge Bell’s statements for a determination in this investigation. The record reveals the entire truth. The record in this case will prove the truth in the statements made in this letter.

The record reveals that in (case # 5:03 CV-0106) the Hon. Bell perjured his oath, acceded to fraud, committed an act of conspiracy as defined in 18 USC § 241 “Conspiracy against Rights”, ignored precedence law, granted favorable treatment to the Defendant, violated cannons 1 and 2A of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges, suborned perjury (See attached exhibits “A” and “B”) and is an accessory after the fact.

Judge Bell is a danger to the people he has sworn to serve. The Hon. Bell has inflicted immeasurable harm on our court system. My cases are only the tip of the iceberg and many citizens in the Western District of Michigan have told me that they wish to testify against this judicial blight sitting behind the bench in our Western District of Michigan.

As chairman for the Michigan Lawman Committee for the Public Interest, the task of bringing forth this issue, for those who have been directly affected by the mayhem caused in Judge Bell’s courtroom, has been given to me. The public’s confidence in our court system here in the Western District of Michigan has been severely shaken by Judge Robert Holmes Bell.

The enclosed letter of July 8th 2005, will serve as William M. Price’s opening statement to begin this investigation. It is our Public Interest Committee’s recommendation that the accused Robert H. Bell be removed from the bench until such time as he is thoroughly investigated by your committee. We believe that this preliminary action is justified by the easily verified, competent evidence already in existence. To allow Bell to continue on the bench in light of this evidence and the record which bears it out, is to subject the citizens in the Western District of Michigan to more judicial torture.
Sincerely,

William M. Price

Notary: The above signed has appeared before me and properly identified himself. He has presented an original and two copies of this four page letter and retains the copies for his records.
Enclosures: A five page letter, the letter July 8, 2005, including exhibits and Judge Bell’s ruling, the letter of August 11, 2005, sent by William M. Price, to Congressman Mike Rogers.

Cc Congressman Mike Rogers

Doug Kenline Supports Ed and Elaine Brown

Mark Cuban Exposes O'Reilly Hypocrisy On Radio Broadcast

Billionaire Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks who is set to finance a cinema release of Loose Change narrated by Charlie Sheen, exposed Bill O'Reilly's rampant hypocrisy concerning his coverage of the 9/11 truth movement on the Fox News host's radio show yesterday.

http://freedomtofascism.blogspot.com/

From The Reader Comments

Thurston said...

In Showing of the Inherent law regarding the Federal Income Tax, questions of liability can also raise questions of constitutionality.

The recent case in the App. Ct. in D.C. shows that where an individual wants the law to be examined to its foundation to make a claim of Constitutionality in the immediate application, the Court must examine the law to its contemporaneous manifestation to the 16th AMendment (Myers v. U.S.).

As this was applied the Court then found for the Citizen and the section of law as applied by the IRS was struck as UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

SEE THE GOVERNMENT DOES GET ABUSIVE AND DOES APPLY ITS ARGUMENTS IN AN OVERBROAD MANNER!

If the definition of gross income is examined in its subjugation to all exemption provisions of Subtitle A, 861 is still there, and its contemporaneous legislation to the 16th AMendment proves that the Browns never made any "gross incoem" as defined by law.

Is this why the Judge does not want the LAW argued in HIS (but what s really OUR) court?

The judge just wants to determine facts without sonsideration of teh LAW that gives rise to facts.

This is tyranny and a railroad by allowing the unconstitutionally overbroad application of law to the property and persons of the Browns.

In the Economy Case it is clearly shown that those outside of the jurisdiction of the IRS cannot be grought into the jurisdiction fo teh IRC, even if they ever filed a return.

From the reader comments here.

Joe Has Passed On To The Other Side

From Anthony inside Ed Brown's house...

It makes me sad to report that Joe, long time friend of the Brown's and the one that was fighting cancer has passed away in the night last night at the hospital.
His wife called the Brown's around 0300 to relay the news.
This was a good man who even served for his country in Vietnam.
This man hung on for a very long time and wanted to live.

R.I.P. Joe


Via Ed Brown's MySpace blog.

Ed Brown Under Siege



Today's Ed Brown RBN radio show now on-line at the RBN Radio Archives.

Listen to today's Ed Brown RBN Radio Show here.

Digging Deeper: Discussing "The Inherent Law"



Our special guest will be David Clarence. Discussion points:


Toward Liberty and Justice for All

This web page is devoted to raising issues that protect the rule of law in the United States. The rule of law consists of several important concepts:


Government decisions are made according to written law and rules

Government sanctions cannot be made up after the fact (ex post facto)

Rules are applied as much as possible consistently to all

Courts provide citizens consistent, written process (due process) before life, liberty, or property is taken

Courts provide reasons based upon the law for their decisions

Rule of law and due process are the bedrock upon which all American liberty and justice are based. Untold numbers of American and Englishmen in history have paid a dear price in effort, fortune, and even life itself, to bequeath to us the rule of law.

Unfortunately, through neglect and design, if not protected, the rule of law and all those values which it protects and we hold dear can be undermined. Over time, this page hopes to bring the American public's attention to dangers that are undermining the rule of law in America.

Click here for more.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Show Us The Law Blog Launched...



Elaine Brown called and left a message this morning to request that we change the focus and title of the site to "Show Us The Law". As she said "for if there is no law then there isn't a need for a trail..." etc. So in addition to changing the focus of the title page on this QFFT blog we also secured the blog name "showusthelaw" over on blogspot.com. You can click here to visit the new blog. We don't want to divide the traffic, but this seems to be an appropriate step to take, especially since we are moving closer to April 24th.

From here on out we will keep the focus on the mantra "Show Us The Law", but the main postings will still be domiciled on this QFFT (Quest For Fair Trail) blog. If anyone would like to assist in this process of updating and maintaining the new "Show Us The Law" blog, please feel free to contact Ed & Elaine or call and leave a message at 214-329-9811.

Phillip Morris asks: "What's A Real Patriot"



Revolutionary grassroots hip-hip patriots, unite banding together in supporting Ed and Elaine Brown! Very special thanks to Phillip Morris ... all » for creating the beat, rap and laying down this fire track. Also thanks very much to Steve at Dick Eats Bush for knocking this out of the park by adding video to this track!

http://www.MySpace.com/PhillipMorris
http://www.DickEatsBush.com
http://www.ShowEdTheLaw.com

QFFT Suppporter "Albert" Comments...


Are law enforcement personnel required to know the specifics of the laws they are entrusted to enforce? If not, then why? How do those people in the nations law enforcement apparatus know when they are carrying out orders that are unlawful? Are they not also sworn to defend the constitution from enemies within? Doesn't defending the constitution mean the exact same thing as defending the rights of the people? The right to property. The right to privacy. The right to do anything we chose to do so long as we do not injure or trespass on the rights of others? If Section 6331 of the Internal Revenue Code restricts the governments power to levy property to those persons who are specifically pointed out in section 6331(a)

Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)

And section 3401(d) shows that the definition of employer is restricted to the "Federal Government", how then did a Federal Judge hide this plain in "your face" fact from a supposedly neutral jury? Can any other conclusion be reached by a rational thinking person other than that there was a clear intent to deceive? Is this same method of deception being used upon the US Marshals to justify arresting The Browns who have committed NO CRIME? The Federal Government does not have the constitutional authority to regulate the private business carried on within the individual states that takes place between private citizens. This is one reason why their power to levy is restricted.

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1260.ZO.html Copy this link paste it to your browser and read what the US Supreme Court has ruled In United States v. Lopez (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995). Do the US Marshals Know about this land mark case? If the Federal Government has no authority to confiscate private property by means of levy then it has no authority to confiscate the private property of US citizens engaged in commercial activities of COMMON RIGHT in the name of an income tax.

After Waco and Ruby Ridge, the perception of millions toward the nations police forces has changed. Many people now believe that those who carry a badge have been NAZIFIED. Whether or not this is true now depends on what happens to ED and Elaine Brown. Will the law enforcement apparatus act as "MAFIA MUSCLE" or will they recognized the fact that a Federal judge along with the IRS and a Federal prosecutor conspired to rail road an innocent American couple into prison an then steel the couples' property while the media vilified and demonized the Browns in their propaganda head lines? Click here and here for more.

At what point would you defend your family and your life?


Lets just say,.....You were one of the Brown's for a sec and dealing with this issue.

You asked to see the law and even offered to pay it just to make it go away but, "They" want everything and have been known to kill people over such issues.

For me: If any man/animal comes offensively towards me or those I care/love in a violent aggressive nature with intent to hurt or kill. I will not send them a fruit basket and hope they go away.

At what point would you defend your family and your life?

Wait till they come on your land with force/weapons?
Wait till they try to come in your home?
Wait till you see the whites of their eyes?
Or just surrender to a so called law they can not show and go to prison for a very long time?
(Do not pass go, do not collect $200)

Does not have to be any above reasons but...

At what point would you defend your family and your life?

Click here for more.

Report From Ed Brown House

Today started off nice weather-wise.
It stayed nice, sunny and one could smell spring fresh and crisp till afternoon.
Then it started to rain on and off.
Afew visitors came over and one was a member of Elaine's family which was a pleasure to meet.
A single prop plane did its rounds around and around above the house.
Ed believes it was the same one that comes around and does the same thing.
Everyone remains on high alert with every passing day.
I guess even after 2+ months, Im still not use to abunch of people sitting inside & outside in the dark.....waiting....watching....listening.

Read more at Ed Brown MySpace blog.

Audio Moblog

powered by Audioblog.com




MP3 File

Join The QFFT Revolution



As John Perkins would say, "Now is the time!"

We are looking to open up hundreds, if not thousands of Quest For Fair Trial (QFFT) sites, blogs, platforms, groups and resource networks nationwide. All anyone needs is a mind that works and a heart/soul that is driven by the love of truth to help and serve others.

Envision The End:
the ONE Lord God who gave us the Ten Commandments and fullfilled scripture by taking on a Human manifestion as the saviour and redeemer of mankind. The Divine influence of His spirit was received by Thomas Paine and our founding Fathers and continues to be received today in the form the principals of Ed Griffin's "Freedom Force International". There are other examples "out there" such as Cheryl Marie's "We The People Have The Power".

Witness The Cause: in the spiritual fire and energy that drove individuals like Bob Schulz to begin the process of "institutionalizing vigilance" using We The People's 1st Amendment "Right To Petition" which directly influenced and gave Aaron Russo the tools and evidence he needed to create his ground-breaking documentary, America: Freedom To Fascism (AFTF)

Celebrate The Effect: of the singular power and force behind Ed and Elaine Brown's stand against tyranny.

These Three (3) examples correspond to the THE CORE HUB of what we consider to be "Wheels Of Freedom" which can be duplicated, replicated and celebrated throughout our world. We need more and more and more examples of these HUBs to manifest for they correspond to a simple, yet powerful, clearing point/area for the time, trust and energies of individuals who are dedicated to support the cause of freedom and liberty in our world.

To create and support these "Wheels Of Freedom" we need spokes to attach to these hubs so that more and more and more wheels manifest, thus motivating more and more individuals do ACT in empowering ways to help and serve others so that we can all come together and work together to transform our world into a Heaven on earth where Divine Order can manifest.

From here on out we are looking for individuals, groups, networks - of all shapes, sizes and dispositions - to connect to these hubs just as spokes connect to the wheels on a bicycle.

Quest For Fair Trial In Manhatten, NY: Toasted Police Cars Along FDR "New Deal" Drive



What Melted Cop Cars 7 Blocks From WTC On 911?



Click here for more.

Editor's Note:
We are looking for contributors and content on a new blog we created this morning entitled "Quest For Fair Trial In New York, New York" - please visit this link.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

03/20/07 Police at the Brown's house

Income Tax Panel Added to GML 2007



On March 3rd we posted an article titled “Judiciary vs. Judiciary,” which introduced you to Shreveport, Louisiana attorney Tommy Cryer. The article began with this sentence:

“If all attorneys are officers of the courts that make up the judicial branch of the government, then the government now has one of its best and brightest members challenging the legality of the operation and enforcement of the federal income tax system on constitutional and statutory grounds.

Mark our words, Tom Cryer is going to make a positive difference in the People’s quest for the truth regarding the fraudulent origin and illegal operation of the federal income tax system. He has a lot going for him.

Read more here.

The Hourglass

By Bill Price

March 24, 2007

Judges are taking notice. The sand in the top of the hourglass is rapidly receding. What does the sand in the top represent? The time left before their judicial fraud is discovered by the public. As long the narrow opening between the top and bottom of the glass remained clogged with news boycotts, the men in black felt safe and secure. Time was standing still for our judges. But, the times they are changing, and here’s a little quote, to all the skeptics:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications who have attended our meetings…for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the light of publicity during those years.” David Rockefeller, CFR member 1991

Obviously our judges had an entirely different interpretation of the blindfold on the lady holding the scales. By their honors’ repeated actions, it is clear that her scales of justice were off limits to pro-se litigants: Chuck Conces, Ed and Elaine Brown, Erwin Schiff, etc., etc. Someone please e-mail me a list of the pro-se litigants that have prevailed in our courts of justice…I’ll nominate the list for a new postage stamp.

There is something else analogous to the hourglass. All of us have only so much time to live. How big does life’s hourglass seem to those who are about to lose their life, or that have lost their liberty, as the minutes trickle through to the bottom? For all of you prisoners: I will not pretend to know your loss, but I will tell you that your sacrifice of life’s minutes is adding to yet another hourglass. It’s the one that George Washington poured his time into. Likewise, Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin and Andrew Jackson made contributions to, but theirs was no more precious or more valuable than Ed and Elaine Brown’s, Philip Dahl’s, Chuck Conces’s Erwin Schiff’s, Larkin Rose’s, Richard Simkanin’s, or any of those brave men and women whose shoulders we are now standing on out here. If we were to try and forget the time added to this nation’s hourglass by these brave people, a million ghosts who have poured their souls into insuring that time does not run out on our Constitution and this Republic, would haunt us for eternity. Article 4 §4

Bill Price

Freedom to Fascism, an Orwellian Odyssey

“Come writers and critics who prophesize with your pen – keep your eyes open wide this chance won’t come again – and don’t speak too soon for the wheel is still in spin, and there’s no telling who it will be naming …. for the times they are a changing…” Bob Dylan 1964.

Lately some writers and critics have tried to forewarn the middle class of the coming crisis. Pat Buchanan’s effort to sound the alarm against NAFTA, GATT and the WTO, is a recent example. The media conglomerates have shown time and again just how easily they can manage such forays into the public consciousness. The wheel of fate alluded to in Dylan’s song has come to rest. Names have been named, places revealed, dates are now known and the future then, now occupies its place in history.

George Orwell would have been pleased to see this day in America. Orwell’s novels “Animal Farm” and “1984” predicted a state of totalitarianism in the world. Regrettably, Orwell did not live to see the phenomena you are about to witness. The movie “America, Freedom to Fascism” is an expose’ on the Federal Income Tax, the Federal Reserve Banking/system and finally the facts about an international cartel that has been very busy “arranging” your entire future. It is more powerful than anything you have seen. Ironically, these world planners featured in Aaron Russo’s movie, have something in common with George Orwell, their most notable critic. The cartel’s global plan for the middle class, and the title of Mr. Orwell’s most famous book, could very well share the same name, “Animal Farm”

“Animal Farm” released in 1945 was an ominous warning to the world. There was another ominous release that year, the atomic bombs over Nagasaki and Hiroshima. “Freedom to Fascism” was released in 2006 and with it, something even more powerful than the atomic bomb, the truth.

“Gather round people wherever you roam, and admit that the waters around you have grown - so you better start swimming or you’ll sink like a stone, if to you your time is worth saving, for the times they are a changing…”

Is our time worth saving? Spread the word, by using the most powerful weapon known to man, the truth. Watch and share “America, Freedom to Fascism”.

“Keep your eyes open wide this chance won’t come again…for the times they are a changing...”

This introduction was prepared by Bill Price. The producer and director of “America, Freedom to Fascism”, Aaron Russo does not necessarily endorse the views expressed herein. For additional information on the federal income tax, visit www.article1-taxation.com

Beech Grove IN FEMA Camp with Better Quality Video


Friday, March 23, 2007

Ed & Elaine Brown T-Shirts From The Jabrones Band



Click here to order.

Editors Note: This is it! NOW is the time! Let the music of the Lord's power, truth, love and justice begin flowing higher and higher and higher with the angels of heaven in support of Ed and Elaine Brown!

Canadian Band, The Jabrones, Support Ed & Elaine Brown


For up to the minute news on the Brown's case go to www.edbrown.org

We are currently recording our "Save Ed Brown" cd. All of the songs are inspired by the story of Ed Brown and his on going stand off with the IRS, Aaron Russo's film "America: Freedom To Fascism", and the writings of men such as
G. Edward Griffin and Cleon Skousen.

The album is dedicated to trying to get the word out about Ed's plight. Although we are a Canadian band, we are devoting our time and energy to this project because we believe that Ed's case is one which we have all faced, to one degree or another, in dealing with our governments and their minions.

Click here for more.

Editors Note: Thank you guys very, very much! We would be greatly honored to have you play in New Hampshire at an upcoming "Freedom Festival" in support of Ed & Elaine Brown. Think BIG!

LIVE FREE OR DIE : ED BROWN SONG



Editors Note: This video/song was produced by the Canadian band, The Jabrones - see the post immediately above and click here for more. Let's keep the music in support of Ed and Elaine Brown rolling!

AFTF Email Campaign Hits "FoxNews" Bullseye In Support of Ron Paul

Did you hear about how our letters and emails beat FoxNews into covering Ron Paul's candidacy?


Here's the email we sent out off of Aaron's original email:

AFTF Midwest
Mar 20 (3 days ago)
to aftfmidwest@gmail.com
bcc

AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com,
Atlarge@foxnews.com,
Beltway@foxnews.com,
Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com,
Bullsandbears@foxnews.com,
Cash@foxnews.com,
Cavuto@foxnews.com,
colonelscorner@foxnews.com,
Comments@foxnews.com,
Drmanny@foxnews.com,
Fatherjonathan@foxnews.com,
Feedback@foxnews.com,
Fncimag@foxnews.com,
Fncspecials@foxnews.com,
FNS@foxnews.com,
Forbes@foxnews.com,
Foxreport@foxnews.com,
Friends@foxnews.com,
Hannityandcolmes@foxnews.com,
Heartland@foxnews.com,
Hemmer@foxnews.com,
housecall@foxnews.com,
Jamie@foxnews.com,
JER@foxnews.com,
Lineup@foxnews.com,
Lisonlaw@foxnews.com,
Martha@foxnews.com,
Myword@foxnews.com,
Newswatch@foxnews.com,
Ontherecord@foxnews.com,
Oreilly@foxnews.com,
Redeye@foxnews.com,
Special@foxnews.com,
Studiob@foxnews.com
date Mar 20, 2007 7:10 PM
subject Fair and Balanced?
mailed-by gmail.com

Dear Sirs:

Fair and Balanced?

Since Dr. Ron Paul announced his campaign for the Presidency in 2008 not one word on the news.. Where are the so called Fair and Balanced news casts on Fox News? Not a peep about Ron Paul.

Ron Paul is the only candidate that is FAIR AND BALLANCED.


Sincerely,

Volunteers From AFTF-Midwest

America: Freedom To Fascism (AFTF)
http://www.freedomtofascism.com



We have only just begun to fight!

Tommy Cryer RBN Radio Show



The Tommy Cryer Show

Listen to Tommy Cryer RBN Radio Show archives here.

To find archives go to republicbroadcasting.org and click on show archives.

THE BIG LIE: The Federal government has been telling people that they must file returns and pay income taxes on their wages, salaries and fees they gave up their labor, time and a large part of their lives to obtain, but those earnings are Constitutionally EXEMPT from the income tax. AND THE GOVERNMENT KNOWS IT!!

See Tommy Cryer's website here.

Ed Brown Under Siege


Ed Brown RBN Radio Show Archives
Now Online at RBN



Listen to all Ed Brown RBN radio show archives here.

To find archives go to republicbroadcasting.org and click on show archives.

Thank you RBN!

CNN Jack Cafferty on the IRS

Jack Cafferty sounds off on the stories crossing his radar. Write in to answer Jack's hourly questions, and watch to see if he reads your response.

7 p.m.: What's your biggest beef about the Internal Revenue Service?

Answer Jack's question here.

Report from Bob Schulz



Israel Lobby Targets Tax Honesty Movement

Are Kidd, Becraft, Banister and Schulz “Extremists”?


As we reported in our previous article, the upcoming Give Me Liberty 2007 conference will examine U.S. Middle East Policy through the prism of the U.S. Constitution. During the conference we will examine the work of professors Mearsheimer (University of Chicago) and Walt (Harvard University) titled, “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy,” and the book by Jimmy Carter titled, Palestine Peace Not Apartheid.

Read more here.

John Hammell Will Be Our Special Guest on The Ed & Elaine Brown Show Today at 2 pm EST.




Click here to listen.

John Hammell Speaks Out Against CODEX


Codex Alimentarius: The UN grab for your vitamins and freedom. John Hammell explains on Freedom Force conference call. (Edited to 47 mins.) Added to Issues Section Mar 22

"We’re offended by this idea that any government would try to tell us what we can and can’t ingest into our bodies. Now the ruling elite think that they own are our bodies. They consider our bodies their possesions. Their attitude is that our birth certificates have been monetized as collateral against the debt. Their attitude is that, quite literally, that they own us. And right now, their attitude is that their going to take us out. They’re going to take out very large numbers of us if we don’t do exactly what they want. I don’t know about you, but that idea is very offensive to me."

Click here to listen to this groundbreaking interview - click on the top article on the right side.

Click here to visit John Hammell's website.

Nutricide - Criminalizing Natural Health, Vitamins, and Herbs




Here's the link to the official CODEX Alimentarius site.

Why are they doing this?



Click here for more.

USDOJ: WHO WILL STOP THIS CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE?


By: Devvy
March 22, 2007

© 2007 - NewsWithViews.com

A substantial number of Americans have heard at least part of the story of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. Theirs is the story of a corrupt Federal Department of Justice, U.S. prosecutors. They are victims of a sitting president who will unconstitutionally invade a foreign country (Iraq) based on a mountain of lies to "fight the war on terrorism," while at the same time refusing to close our Southern Border. While these two men have had their lives destroyed, as well as their families, we have a Congress full of buzzards and craven individuals who spend their time primping in front of cameras and dining on gold flecked dinner plates who could care less. There are a handful of members of Congress who are actually doing what must be done, but they are being beat into the ground by pro-communist advocates like Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton and foolish mush heads like Barbara Boxer.

Yet another American has fallen victim to that lawless institution out in Washington, DC., former Edwards County Texas sheriff's deputy, Gilmer Hernandez; CNN transcript, Lou Dobbs, March 19, 2007:

"Casey Wian, CNN Correspondent (voice-over): Former Edwards County Texas sheriff's deputy Gilmer Hernandez was just doing his job that day in April 2005, when he attempted to pull over a Suburban loaded with suspected illegal aliens.

Click here for more.

Dr. Edwin Vieira Speaks...


Now, one of the things, though, that I would like to raise as an issue, for your consideration, is a peculiarity that I see between the two subject matters; one, the money issue, the Federal Reserve, if you will, on the one hand, and the income tax on the other hand. I've studied the money issue, case law, statutory law, historical descriptions of what went on, from, I don't know, the Middle 1600's in England up until now. And one of the things you discover, or at least I have discovered, going through all of that, is that the powers that be, very systematically changed the laws as they went along, or they wrote the court opinions in such a way as to rationalize, perhaps not justify, but at least to rationalize, what they were doing.

So you can see a kind of logical progression or degeneration in the statutory and case law from the early days, from the Constitution, from 1789, up until the present time. And they really didn't hide any of this. It's there if you're willing to look. Fascinating thing is, most people aren't willing to look. But, it's not a deep, dark secret.

Whereas, in the area of the income tax, there seems to be, at least to my mind, an anomaly. That is, if I were in charge, politically, of this system, and I had a vast mass of people out there believing that they had to pay these taxes and they had to file these forms and keep these records and perform all of these various functions, even if I knew that the "16th Amendment" hadn't been ratified or that there was some other basic constitutional flaws in what I was doing, it really wouldn't bother me too much, to write the tax statutes and regulations consistently with what the masses of people thought those statutes and regulations said. Why would I care? It's all a con game anyway, right? I'm lying left and right. I can lie in this statute as well I lie in that statute. What difference does it make? Why would I not write the tax code and the tax regulations in the way everybody believes the tax code and the tax regulations are already written?

And I leave that with you, because I think that's a fascinating psychological problem.

Click here for more.

Well Regulated State Militias = Constitutional Homeland Security


YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY FOR "HOMELAND SECURITY"?
PART 1


Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
May 6, 2005
NewsWithViews.com

What is the fundamental constitutional institution for "homeland security"? On the answer to this question may depend the continued independence and freedom of the United States.

In addition, the Constitution provides that "[n]o State shall, without the Consent of Congress, * * * keep Troops, or Ships of War, in time of Peace". Article I, Section 10, Clause 3. So, nowhere in the federal system does the supreme law of the land treat an army or navy as an inevitable, indispensable, permanent, or perpetual institution.

Where, then, should Americans look for constitutional "homeland security"? The Second Amendment to the Constitution provides the first giant steps towards the answer:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Click here for more.

"HOMELAND SECURITY" -- FOR WHAT AND FOR WHOM?

Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D.
March 8, 2005
NewsWithViews.com

Why do so many Americans think that "homeland security" means what they think it means?

If the "homeland" is the United States of America, then obviously her "security" is defined by her Constitution, because there cannot be security without law, and the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Just as obviously, those who are to benefit from that security are the authors of the Constitution and their descendants: We the People.

-----------

The essentials of America’s true, historic "homeland security" are to be found in the Preamble to the Constitution:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Click here for more.

Adversaries of the Militia







The duty of the militia is to protect society, its members, and its Constitution, from anything that may threaten it. That includes foreign enemies, domestic insurrectionists, and disasters, but at the moment, the primary threat to which the Militia needs to respond comes from domestic enemies of the Constitution, which are found in every institution and sector of our society. Many of them are gangsters, and we can speak of the Establishment, gangster government, gangster corporations, banksters, and their minions, many of them driven by the money from narcotrafficking. But it also includes zealots and fascists who pretend to have noble intentions, and may even believe it, but who are the most dangerous of all. These are the adversaries common to militias everywhere:

Corrupt, abusive, and incompetent legislators and executive branch officials
Those who represent special interests and resist reforms that would reduce the efficacy of campaign contributions to influence the outcomes of elections. Corrupt, abusive, and incompetent judges:

Judges who make political decisions instead of legal decisions, and then try to make their decisions look like legal decisions;

Judges who refuse to allow legal arguments to be made in the presence of the jury, or to allow defense counsel to inform the jury they have the power and duty to judge the validity of the charges and the statutes as well as the facts;

Federal judges who preside over cases in which the federal courts lack constitutional jurisdiction;

Election judges who participate in the rigging of elections;

Federal bankruptcy judges who conspire with corrupt receivers to deprive persons of their property;

Click here for more.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Pics of Ron Paul

Lots of pics of Ron Paul here.

In Defense of Ed and Elaine Brown


Friday, 16 March 2007
Paper Number One
Copyright 2007 Glenn David.

What kind of a creature is man that he may be tortured, tormented, and killed in a scheme to exploit his labor?

The question must be asked because that's what income taxes do, they terrorize, torment, and kill people in a benighted scheme to exploit human labor. The question must be asked with urgency because the feds are about to kill Ed and Elaine Brown in their effort to exploit the Brown's labor.

Consider the following analogy. In my home state of Maine, where logging is a major industry, a few people still use horses to work in the woods. When a logger uses a horse to twitch timber from the forest out to a wood yard, he's exploiting the horse's labor, there wouldn't be anything wrong with that - a horse is that kind of creature. However, if the horse displeased the logger in some way, and if the logger deliberately killed the horse while exploiting its labor - if he beat it to death with a whip - that would be a crime. In Maine it would be aggravated cruelty to animals, a felony. But if the feds kill Ed and Elaine Brown in their effort to exploit the Brown's labor, there will be no crime - none whatsoever.

How come?

If you terrorize, torment, and kill a horse while exploiting its labor, it's a crime. Why, then, is it not a crime to terrorize, torment, and kill a man while exploiting his labor?

It defies logic. A logger who killed a horse while attempting to exploit its labor would face a serious charge, but a federal agent who kills a human being while attempting to exploit human labor would face no charges at all. Not even a misdemeanor. In fact, if Ruby Ridge and Waco are indicative, he'd get a medal and a pay raise.

Imagine the details for a moment. A man is working a horse in the forest. For some reason he gets upset with the animal. He then begins to savagely beat the horse with a whip, maiming it. Still enraged, the logger shoots and kills the terrorized beast.

That's considered a crime in every state in the union. And it should be. None of God's living, breathing, feeling creatures should be treated like that so someone may benefit from their sweat and toil. Well, Ed and Elaine Brown are two of God's living, breathing, felling creatures. Yet, federal agents in their scheme to exploit their sweat and toil have plagued the Browns for months. They have tormented them with a sham trial and with the prospect that they will lose their freedom forever. Ed and Elaine Brown face the haunting reality that, like Irwin Schiff, they will receive what's tantamount to a life sentence and die in prison. Tell me that prospect isn't terror and its infliction won't be torment.

And the brutality began months before the Brown's courtroom tribulations. On December 2, 2004 some 30 armed federal agents, including a four-member sniper team, backed up by the local and state police, stormed into Ed and Elaine Brown's home, thus perpetrating a daunting act of terror. Now, the most savage aspect of the whole ordeal is so imminent, that before these words reach the public, the Browns could be dead - and not to collect a legitimate levy; but to impose upon free men a modern form of servitude that armed overseers call a tax.

Neither do I casually call federal tax collectors overseers. Tax collector collect taxes, overseers violently and lethally exploit the labor of individuals. Let me repeat: Tax collectors collect taxes, overseers violently and lethally exploit the labor of individuals.

To directly tax our labor is to directly exploit our labor. Thus, the most insincere argument regarding IRS agents is that they don't violently and lethally exploit our labor; they undeniably do. By this definition they are overseers. And by this definition the armed agents who raided the Brown's home in December 2004, those who now dragoon the couple, threatening their lives, are overseers.

Please don't miss the point: With implements of coercion - such as whips, chains, prison keys, guns, and the like, backed up by the power to kill - overseers coerce the solitary laborer, watching his every productive move from sunrise to sunset without end. Thus, when collecting a so-called tax on our labor, agents from the federal government who coercively watch our every productive move from sunrise to sunset - backed by the power to kill - are once again defined as overseers. To call them tax collectors imperils the nation.

By whatever name they are called, overseers are like a dead canary in a mine, and freedom-loving people must grasp their significance before it's too late. Overseers represent an economic system in which human suffering and human death are casually accepted byproducts of exploiting human labor. Those who toil cannot be fully human; they cannot be truly free. It's impossible. Historically, people have known this.

It's incredible. I'm talking about brutal central governments that accepts human suffering and human death as part of a nationwide scheme to exploit the toiling masses, and I'm talking about the United States of America; not Communist Cuba or Red China, but America. That's inconceivable, but yet it's true.

Neither do I casually call what's happening to Ed and Elaine Brown servitude. After all, no worker can be free if he toils in the presence of overseers; especially legions of them. And why doesn't being killed for your labor make you a slave? What horror other than death - even in the form of a threat - must exist for servitude to exist? Does your master really need the power to buy and sell you? Or does he merely need the right to kill you for your labor, even though that right lies at the end of a long, tortuous process of Kangaroo law and is seldom used?

Historically, a worker who was free from death or crushing punishment only if he prostituted his labor to a violent oppressor was a slave. Due to income taxes, American workers are free from death and crushing punishment only if we prostitute our labor to one of the most violent oppressors in American history, the IRS. Why, then, are we not slaves?

Certainly, we are not chattel slaves - we are wage slaves.

Neither do I casually use the term wage slavery. It's not merely a cute phrase that allows frustrated people to blow off steam. Look at what's happening to Ed Brown and his wife Elaine and you will see the brutal force and deadly might of wage slavery. It's an extremely real and exceptionally potent form of human bondage. It will destroy a worker economically. It will take his liberty. It will take his life. That's real servitude, and it's as cute as an unseen cancer.

But whatever word you use to describe the condition under which we suffer all of our productive lives, from sunrise to sunset without end, the word freedom won't do. In fact, the question should be so much, "Is this slavery?" Even though it is. The question should be, "Is this freedom?" It should be, "Is this the proper role of government?"

So, then, is what we have freedom?

Any worker who's managed with a chain is a slave. I repeat: Any worker who's managed with a chain is a slave. And if you want to see our chains, go to a federal prison. Or better yet, do the patriotic thing. Refuse to be a slave - refuse to pay your taxes. When you do, after a long, torturous process of Kangaroo law, the chains by which you are managed will be placed around your wrists and ankles. You will then be dragged off to a prison and become a worker managed by men with guns - just like Irwin Schiff and countless others.

How can that be freedom? Why isn't that servitude? Why doesn't being a worker who's placed in chains, imprisoned and managed by men with guns make you a slave? What other torment must exist for slavery to exist?

Just because your condition isn't exactly like slaves in the Old South - just because the state doesn't have the right to buy or sell you, doesn't mean you have all the rights to which you're naturally entitled by you Creator. It doesn't mean that being our overseer, as defined earlier, is the proper role of government.

One difference between chattel slavery and the servitude we suffer is that our masters in Washington, D.C. can't sell us down the river, as sometimes happened in the Antebellum South. No, they can't sell us down the river - but they can send us up the river, like they want to do to Ed and Elaine Brown, as they've done to Irwin Schiff and countless others. They can send us up the river to federal prisons, like the ones at Leavenworth, Kansas; Marion, Illinois; and Florence, Colorado.

At Florence, Colorado, one segregation unit has soundproof cells in which prisoners are confined for twenty-three hours a day, seven days a week, year after year after year, from sunrise to sunset without end. It's hell on earth.

Tell me, if in a scheme to exploit your labor you're suffering Hell on earth in solitary confinement, why are you not a slave? If you're a worker - not a murderer, a rapist, or a terrorist, but a worker - who's confined twenty-three house a day in a soundproof cell, year after year after year, what other kind of agonizing torment must exist for slavery to exist? Must you really feel your master's lash upon your back?

Or you you're a worker who can be sent up the river to a more conventional prison - to exploit your labor in particular and the labor of millions of others in general - why doesn't that produce servitude?

In the Old South, people sent down the river - to exploit their labor in particular and the labor of millions of others in general - were separated from their spouses and children; that was part of the punishment, part of the threat - if you did not prostitute your labor to a violent oppressor, the violent oppressor would tear apart your family.

Today, people sent up the river - to exploit their labor in particular and the labor of millions of others in general - are separated from their spouses and children; that's part of the threat, part of the punishment - if you don't prostitute your labor to the IRS, the IRS will tear apart your family. As they tried to do to Ed Brown, whose wife was ordered by her overseer - disguised as a federal judge - to have no physical contact with her husband. After a few weeks of being apart, Elaine Brown bravely returned to her husband's side and put her family back together, which the feds now promise to destroy through lethal violence.

Tell me, if in a scheme to exploit your labor, someone can tear apart your family, why isn't that servitude, regardless of the scheme? More to the point, how can that be freedom? How can a person threatened in such a way be said to enjoy all the rights to which he is naturally entitled? How can destroying families be the proper role of government?

I've made a distinction between tax collectors and overseers. Allow me to carry that a little further. Let me distinguish between a place of punishment and detention set aside for murderers and a place for punishment and detention set aside to aid the state in its exploitation of the toiling masses - one terrorized worker at a time.

A place of punishment and detention set aside for murderers is a prison. A place of punishment and detention set aside for workers is a gulag.

If anyone thinks the term "gulag" is too strong, fine. But the linguistic problem remains. On one hand, you have a place for punishment and detention that has been set aside to deal with murderers. On the other hand, you have a place for punishment and detention that has been set aside to control workers. There's a tremendous difference in that, and, like a dead canary in a mine, it shouldn't be ignored. It should be acknowledged. It should be verbalized. To call a gulag a prison imperils the nation.

Consequently, a murderer who's confined in a soundproof cell for twenty-three hours a day is in a prison. But a worker who's confined in a soundproof cell for twenty-three hours a day is in a gulag. And what American worthy of the name will declare that building and maintaining places of punishment and detention to control the toiling masses - one terrified worker at a time - is the proper role of government? It isn't. It's not the freedom to which we are naturally entitled by our Creator. How can a worker be free if he toils in the shadow of a gulag?

Let me again compare the exploitation of animal and human labor.

I believe most Americans will agree that our nation must not be a place where the vicious death of an animal is an acceptable part of exploiting animal labor, the violation of that precept being a crime. Why, then, can't we agree that our nation must be a place where the vicious death of a person is an acceptable part of exploiting human labor? Why can't we agree that violating that precept is a crime? Am I missing some complex philosophical construct that prohibits lethal brutality from being used against nonhuman sources of labor but allows it against human sources of labor? What kind of creature does that make man?

Let us also examine our reaction to these two different fatal scenarios, the former being hypothetical while the plight of Ed and Elaine Brown is all too real.

If animal lovers received news of a logger who abused a work horse as I've described, there would be a national outcry. The news media would be in a frenzy. Animal rights activists would scream that justice could not exist until the brutal logger was arrested, tried, convicted, and punished. And if that cold-hearted woodman threatened another horse, then from across the nation untold numbers of people would arise, throngs would begin to converge on the scene of impending slaughter, vowing to defend that animal to the death.

Tell me America, if you would do that for an animal, why not do as much for a human being? Why not arise en mass and converge on Plainfield, New Hampshire, vowing to defend Ed and Elaine Brown to the death? If horses were being brutalized and killed in Plainfield, New Hampshire to exploit their labor, and no one spoke up or no one came, it would speak volumes about the nation's soul. Well, Ed and Elaine Brown are being brutalized - and one day they will be killed in the federal government's scheme to exploit their labor - and you have not said a word, you have not come. Where is your soul?

Neither do I casually say the following - Ed and Elaine Brown will not be the last patriots to take the stand they have taken, which is - Live Free or Die. Others will step forward because the federal courts are utterly corrupt. Look at what happened to Irwin Schiff. Mr. Schiff committed no crime - for which he received a mock trial and a life sentence. And if in a scheme to exploit your labor, you lose your freedom for the rest of your life, as Mr. Schiff did, why are you not a slave? What other kind of excruciating pain must you suffer before servitude exists?

Others will be forced to take the stand the Browns have been forced to take because the federal government's murder of Gordon Kahl, their badgering Alex Council to suicide, the fate of Irwin Schiff, the on-going siege in New Hampshire have taught patriots a painful lesson - federal judges ignore both the Constitution and the law, there will stubbornly defy reason; pushed into a corner by the right, there will nonetheless defend to the bitter end their peculiar institution of violently and lethally exploiting our labor, which they piously call a tax. Thus, there is no recourse in the courts.

Adding to our dilemma is the fact that the national press is filled with whores, liars, lost souls, and a few shipwrecked seekers of truth - some like Robinson Crusoe, some like Gillian. But as a group, they keep the masses snoring in a drooling servitude.

Thus, there is no refuge except God and the gun for a man who would not live as a slave - which is what we do when we refuse to be workers managed by chains and men with guns; which is what we do when we refuse to toil in the presence of overseers and gulags.

Ultimately, there is no hope for any of us unless we go to Plainfield, New Hampshire and defend Ed and Elaine Brown. The Brown's fate is our fate. As the Browns go, so goes our freedom. You need not stay for the duration, but for a month, a week, or a day. It will speak volumes about your soul. It will send a message to the elected aristocracy in Washington, D.C. a message; that the people are armed and possess the spirit of resistance.

And if you cannot stand with the Browns, why not stand up where you are? Why not raise your voice in protest? Why not tell our de facto masters that any free man or free woman who is killed in a scheme to exploit human labor has been murdered; those who do the killing are murderers; that justice will not exist until all such murderers are arrested, tried, convicted, and punished for their crimes - including execution, where warranted.

Why not stand up before the Founding Mothers and the Founding Fathers - and when asked the question: What kind of creature is a man that he may be terrorized, tormented, and killed in a scheme to exploit his labor, why not get in the overseer's face and with clenched teeth say - Man is not that kind of creature - no more so that a horse.

Glenn David.

 

SITEMETER