QFFT Suppporter "Albert" Comments...

Are law enforcement personnel required to know the specifics of the laws they are entrusted to enforce? If not, then why? How do those people in the nations law enforcement apparatus know when they are carrying out orders that are unlawful? Are they not also sworn to defend the constitution from enemies within? Doesn't defending the constitution mean the exact same thing as defending the rights of the people? The right to property. The right to privacy. The right to do anything we chose to do so long as we do not injure or trespass on the rights of others? If Section 6331 of the Internal Revenue Code restricts the governments power to levy property to those persons who are specifically pointed out in section 6331(a)

Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)

And section 3401(d) shows that the definition of employer is restricted to the "Federal Government", how then did a Federal Judge hide this plain in "your face" fact from a supposedly neutral jury? Can any other conclusion be reached by a rational thinking person other than that there was a clear intent to deceive? Is this same method of deception being used upon the US Marshals to justify arresting The Browns who have committed NO CRIME? The Federal Government does not have the constitutional authority to regulate the private business carried on within the individual states that takes place between private citizens. This is one reason why their power to levy is restricted.

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/93-1260.ZO.html Copy this link paste it to your browser and read what the US Supreme Court has ruled In United States v. Lopez (93-1260), 514 U.S. 549 (1995). Do the US Marshals Know about this land mark case? If the Federal Government has no authority to confiscate private property by means of levy then it has no authority to confiscate the private property of US citizens engaged in commercial activities of COMMON RIGHT in the name of an income tax.

After Waco and Ruby Ridge, the perception of millions toward the nations police forces has changed. Many people now believe that those who carry a badge have been NAZIFIED. Whether or not this is true now depends on what happens to ED and Elaine Brown. Will the law enforcement apparatus act as "MAFIA MUSCLE" or will they recognized the fact that a Federal judge along with the IRS and a Federal prosecutor conspired to rail road an innocent American couple into prison an then steel the couples' property while the media vilified and demonized the Browns in their propaganda head lines? Click here and here for more.