The "I Support Ed And Elaine Brown Blog"
Ed and Elaine Brown are right in their fight with the IRS and the government. There is no law giving the government the right to tax income. The 16th amendment giving the government the right to tax income, was never ratified. In other words, it was never approved. That was in 1913, and to this day, it is not legal to tax income.
Like it or not, believe it or not, the law is on the side of the Browns.
Anyone who does not agree is ignorant of the law, and believes anything the government tells them.
Thomas Jefferson said to question authority.
We had better question today's government.
George Vreeland Hill - I Support Ed and Elaine Brown blog
3:09 PM
Editor's Note: Thanks so much George!!
posted by The Freedom Fellowship at
6:10 PM
3 Comments:
Sorry but it was ratified, whether by fraud or otherwise. This argument is dead as far as liability for income tax goes.
We are not liable because the 16th amendment did not give the government any new power to tax and because there is no law making the labor of American's taxable by the federal government. \\
When are we all going to get on the same band wagon.
Kosmic ...
How can you say it was ratified if it was by fraud?
My case holds true.
The 16th amendment did not give any new power to tax, but the fact is that the 16th amendment did not give any power to tax no matter if it is new or not.
The 16th amendment never came into law.
George.
I have to agree that the 16th Amendment should not be the primary issue in this tax battle.
Title 26 USC is impeccably Constitutional BECAUSE, as written, it DOES NOT tax the income of the average American wage-earner. It only taxes "TAXABLE INCOME".
See: www.whatistaxed.com/
The uninformed believers in the Individual Income Tax respond by saying something like, "Taxable income is gross income minus deductions" (and so the tax applies to all); but they leave out this CRUCIAL introduction--- "Except as otherwise provided...".
The Tax Code is riddled with phrases like that. "Section XX.XX to the contrary notwithstanding...", or, "Except as provided for in Section XX.XX...", "In general...", "Notwithstanding Section 61...", "Other than those specified...", "Except for excluded income...", etc.---when deciphering the Tax Code, ALL such phrases must be researched further.
The average duped American never bothers to fully research anything beyond, "There is imposed on the income of every individual a tax...". No wonder they think the tax applies to everyone! You people who oppose the Tax Honesty Movement really do need to read the ENTIRE THING---26 USC, Subtitle A, Chapter 1 (the Income Tax)...and when it says things like, "Notwithstanding Section 61...", you have to go to 61 and see what they're talking about.
Some dupe/dope in one comment on another website said something like, "They keep saying 'Show me the law!'---well, it's on the very first page!". Such people don't have a clue; they don't do proper due diligence.
Sincerely,
Scott
http://individualsovereignty.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home