USA v Langenour Drops HUGE BOMB on Courtroom Criminals
What makes this case a bombshell?
As you will see when you view documents 70 through 76 of the case, the DOJ attempted to get the Langenours to admit to all kinds of tax obligations. Instead, the Langenours accused the DOJ of a plethora of crimes, and they made many assertions about income tax-related issues.
The DOJ not answer. The DOJ by silence and acquiescence thereby admitted, agreed, and confessed to all the Langenours' assertions.
Read more here.
3 Comments:
Support for Ed and Elaine Brown still in freefall.
http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=s29edbrown&r=33
It will not be long before they are forgotten about completely.
The rest of the court docket tells a different story...
SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/21/06:Initial Disclosures shall made w/in 10 days from date of this Order. Discovery due by 2/14/2007. Dispositive Motion due by 4/11/2007. Pretrial Conference set for 6/11/2007 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) and Jury Trial set for 9/11/2007 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Within 10 days from date of Order, plaintiff shall file a Status Report and w/in 30 days from date of Order, plaintiff shall file dismissal of defendant Washington Mutual Bank or move for Default Judgment. (Marciel, M) (Entered: 08/22/2006)
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/19/06 DENYING 57 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants are cautioned that further filing of frivolous pleadings may result in their answer being stricken and default entered against them.(Donati, J) (Entered: 10/20/2006)
Who's Joey?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home