Tempest In A Teapot
36 comments on We The People's post "Speaking To Power".
There's only ONE (1) question: Is our government a servant or master? Nothing else really matters. Good government honors God and is the servant to truth, justice and We The People. Bad government abhors God and serves the interest of evil. Period.
It's time to activate the accountability clause in the 1st amendment:
TEN SIMPLE WORDS:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, 1) and 2) to 3) petition 4) the 5) Government 6) for 7) a 8) redress 9) of 10) grievances.
We The People have petitioned our servant government for redress of grievances and our government refuses to answer. Why?
We The People Foundation wrote:
"With regard to our First Amendment, first impression, questions now before the Courts, there really is, and can be, no "middle ground" under our system of self-government and Popular Sovereignty. Either the People are Free or they are not. Either the Government is a servant government, beholden to the People and constrained in its authority to act by the written word of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, or it is the Master of our house -- the United States of America."
Dear reader, ask yourself: what side of the line are you on? Do you believe our govermment is not beholden to We The People? Do you believe that our government is "the Master of our house?" Do you believe that our government should no longer be "constained in its authority to act by the written word of the Constitution and Bill of Rights?"
posted by The Freedom Fellowship at
11:12 PM
12 Comments:
RE: "There's only ONE (1) question: Is our government a servant or master? Nothing else really matters." ---
EXACTLY CORRECT.
Please see:
www.foavc.org/
If that doesn't convince folks that the hacks in DC are no longer responsive to the People, then nothing will.
[By the way, on four different occasions 2/3 of the States submitted requests on the same subject.]
Sincerely,
Scott
http://individualsovereignty.blogspot.com/
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion......but you guys do like to pick and choice what the laws you pay attention to.
The first amendment only says that citizens have a right to petition, but it doesn't say that citizens have a right to the answer they want. For that simple, easy reason the courts have dismissed WTP's bogus lawsuit.
But even if the courts held that the government had to answer, the government's response would have been very easy: It already has answered, see http://www.irs.gov/taxpros/article/0,,id=159853,00.html
That some of you kooks don't like the answers is of no consequence to the rest of us.
The truth at http://www.hereisthelaw.com along with a $10 million challenge.
BTW, Bob Schulz has his own reservation for the Big House that will be coming up very soon. Maybe he and Ed can play checkers, although it was funny to watch how quickly WTP abandoned Ed and Elaine's cause and did nothing of any value to help them.
Face the truth at http://www.hereisthelaw.com
Again I would point out: hereisthelaw wants someone to PROVE a negative. Very interesting, but not logical.
I realize that they don't teach Logic in schools anymore, but perhaps sooltauq can PROVE to us that there is no live unicorn running around somewhere on Earth.
Now make certain that what you offer is actual PROOF of that negative.
We're waiting.
:)
Sincerely,
Scott
http://individualsovereignty.blogspot.com/
To Trent:
I'm a Buddhist---have been since 1974---and I know of no law respecting an establishment of a religion in this country.
To which USC Title are you referring?
Sincerely,
Scott
Still waiting for you to first prove that Lynne Meredith, Irwin Schiff, Dick Simkanin, Ed and Elaine Brown, etc., are not in jail.
http://www.hereisthelaw.com
Take the $10 million challenge ! ! !
To sooltauq:
1. You never asked me to do that.
2. You're the one who first introduced the concept of proving a negative, with your ad nauseum promotion of hereisthelaw, and your challenge to readers here to prove that there is NOT a law requiring the average American to pay income taxes.
3. Your continual avoidance of my challenge to you to PROVE that there is NOT a unicorn running around somewhere on Earth demonstrates that either: a) you don't understand the fallacy of proving a negative; or b) you admit (by default) that the challenge at hereisthelaw is illogical, without merit, and bogus.
I'm thinking now that it's 3a (above). Even so, 3b applies.
No more time for you. Come back when you've taken a course in Logic.
:)
Sincerely,
Scott
Trent .... Just go away please! Only thing Bush has ever said that I agree with is "If you're not with us ~ than you're against US"
Here's a good video you should watch to prepare yourself for what lays ahead for you!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4ByWZcwjp4 Just be prepared and walk passively into the fema camps!
Scott,
You come back to me when a tax protestor finally wins a case where by they avoid liability, out of the hundreds of cases that they have lost so far.
You want proof? The best proof that your pet theories are wroing is that those who adopt your pet theories are behind bars. Can't get better proof than that.
The truth and a $10 million challenge at http://www.hereisthelaw.com This challenge does not require logic or research, but simply a "win" before the U.S. Supreme Court or any U.S. Court of Appeals. You win, you get $10 million, simple as that.
"Just be prepared and walk passively into the fema camps!"
Conspiracy Central, maybe next we can hear about the UFOs and their human orifice probes . . .
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/finally-action-ron-pau_b_69042.html
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home