Mutiny on the Rebellion
We live in a world rife with confusion. Our highest government official is on record as cursing the very Constitution that his own authority to rule comes from. We have agencies (IRS) that print lies in their official literature about the authority they allege to operate under. People are becoming more perturbed over these disturbing events and may eventually find themselves in a mutiny against the rebellion.
What is being rebelled against? Answer: The U. S. Constitution. You know… that “God damn piece of paper” George Bush was complaining about. Another target of the rebels on Capitol Hill is precedence law. That damn precedence law has been getting in the way of the rebellion for generations. It’s that damn Supremacy clause in Article VI. “The Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; … shall be the Supreme Law of the land.” For example, precedence law says that the purpose of the 16th Amendment was, and still is, to “relieve all income taxes when imposed from apportionment from a consideration of the source”. Most folks new to such issues do not realize what that means, so, let’s break down this simple sentence from the 1916 Supreme Court decision in Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad. First part: “relieve all income taxes when imposed from apportionment…” The key to understanding this part depends on knowing the meaning of the word “apportionment”. Blacks Law Dictionary says: “Apportionment. n. 1. Division into proportionate shares.” We know according to its definition that to apportion means to divide into equal parts. The rebels in Washington D.C. hate all of this nonsense in Precedence Law, Black’s Law Dictionary and the Constitution. Moving on…
When does apportionment happen? Answer: When Congress votes for it. When is the last time the U.S. Congress voted for it? Answer: During the Civil War. Congress voted to apportion a tax of $20 million during the Civil War. Once the tax was paid by the citizens of the several states back in 1861, it was finished, complete…all done. Until Congress decides to vote again to apportion another direct tax per Article 1 § 2 part 3 and Article 1 § 9 part 4., there is no apportionment, and hence no legal authorization for a tax on our labor. Congress has not voted to apportion a direct tax since 1861. Our government is in rebellion to the highest law in the land by imposing un-apportioned taxes on the labor of U.S. citizens.
Now let’s look at the second part of this high-jacked precedence law:”…from a consideration of the source”. This simply means that the 16th Amendment relieves the taxing authority (U.S. government) from any of the constitutional prohibitions mandated in Article 1 for direct taxes, once apportionment is voted for by the U.S. Congress. So relieving “…from a consideration of the source” means to temporarily remove the Constitutional restrictions stipulated in Article 1 § 2 part 3 and Article 1 § 9 part 4. This, according to our one and only Constitutional Court, prevents the Constitution from contradicting itself, especially in the case of the ”income” tax.
The Bottom Line
So there you have it, the 16 Amendment’s purpose according to the highest law in the land. The IRS, a rebel agency has contempt for our highest law. According to it the IRS cannot use the 16th Amendment as their authority to collect “income” tax on all individuals. They (IRS) are lying to the people. Bottom line, two and a half out of the three branches of our government are in rebellion against their own authority for governing. The only part of our government not in active rebellion is found in the judicial branch, the High Court, which has remained isolated by their predecessors’ decisions. The rulings declared in the Supreme Court’s early decisions have made it extremely difficult for this Constitutional body to be absorbed into the rebellion. But, the ice between the Supreme Court and Congress’s Article III lower court system is getting very thin. The silence between the higher and lower courts could eventually cause the higher court to become complicit/submerged in officialdom’s rebellion. Be careful Judge Roberts, and company, your silence if continued will be your undoing.
In the Beginning
When did the rebellion start? There are a lot of wild theories, but officially the answer can be placed at the very beginning. Our first Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, corresponded with the money interests in England, and stated on April 30, 1781 in a letter to Robert Morris, superintendent of finance for the Continental Congress:
“A national debt, if it is not excessive, will be a national blessing; a powerful cement of union; a necessity for keeping up taxation, and a spur to industry.”
Hamilton must have “forgotten” about: “Congress shall have the power to coin money, regulate the value thereof; and of foreign coin…” U.S Constitution Article I § 8 part 5 The authority to create money comes exclusively from our Constitution and requires Congressional action. Our first Treasurer advocated debt instead of using the authority granted to the U.S Congress in our Constitution. Hamilton was advocating rebellion from Constitutional authority to create money free from the profits of the manipulating “money trust”. Alexander Hamilton is one of the most prominent patriarchs in this over 200 year rebellion. He used his power and influence for evil purposes.
“Mr. Hamilton succeeded in getting banking laws passed, which were in violation of the Constitution of United States.” “Money Creators”, Gertrude Coogan
The Revolution Has Begun
More people are joining this, so far, peaceable revolt to try and stop this ongoing rebellion against our Republic. Officialdom is rebelling against the limits placed on their actions by the Constitution. A particularly repugnant aspect of this rebellion is the anarchists that are currently posing as lower court judges in our U.S. District Courts. For the most part, these judges have become arrogant renegade imposters. They are conducting themselves as juvenile delinquents whose parents have gone on an indefinite vacation. Today’s Supreme Court should be choosing cases for the purpose of correcting these lower court rebels. These “judges” are torturing the U.S. citizenry with their “non servum” I will not serve true authority. It will not go well for the sitting Supreme Court judges if they continue to play the role of the vacationing parent.
Judge Dawson stated in his courtroom that he would not allow the Defendant, Erwin Schiff, to use precedence law as a defense. We know that with the publicity given to that trial, most of the sitting Supreme Court justices know of Dawson’s treason. His remarks are irrefutable evidence that Judge Dawson is a madman. Our Supreme Court Judges all have standing/authority to bring charges against the Hon. Judge Dawson, since he is under their review and has made public his defiance against their authority.
There’s Something Happening over Here
“There’s somethin’ happening’ here. What it is ain’t exactly clear. There’s a man with a gun over there, telling me I gotta beware. I think its time we Stop, Hey, what’s that sound, everybody look what’s going down.” Buffalo Springfield 1967
Today “the man with a gun over there”, is more than likely assigned to that post. These assignments are more frequently coming from judicial members of the rebellion. We better stop! Ask, “What’s that sound?”
Our police forces are being militarized under the guise of terrorism. Our rights to travel are being curtailed under the guise of terrorism. Our conversations through internet and telephone are free game for snooping government surveillance, under the guise of terrorism. “… Stop, hey what’s that sound, everybody look what’s going down.”
For more information on the federal income tax visit http://www.article1-taxation.com/flyer.html