Toward an American Shibboleth!
by Tim Wingate
Exclusive to STR
January 26, 2007
“Once an individual who would advance liberty has settled on self-perfection as correct method, the first fact to bear in mind is that ours is not a numbers problem. Were it necessary to bring a majority into a comprehension of the libertarian philosophy, the cause of liberty would be utterly hopeless. Every significant movement in history has been led by one or just a few individuals with a small minority of energetic supporters.” ~ Leonard E. Read
“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.” ~ Samuel Adams
The story behind the word is recorded in the biblical Book of Judges Chapter 12, verses 1-15. The word shibboleth in ancient Hebrew dialects meant “ear of grain” or “torrent.” Cousins and countrymen, members of the two Israelite tribes Ephraim and Manasseh, have a quarrel over booty from a battle that Ephraim sat out. The Ephraimites invade Manasseh’s area of Gilead and are defeated. The survivors attempt to retreat across the river Jordan back to Ephraim. The Gileadites set up a blockade to catch the fleeing Ephraimites. The sentries asked each person to say the word shibboleth. The Ephraimites, who had no sh sound in their dialect, pronounced the word with an s and were thereby unmasked as the enemy and executed. Book of Judges 12:5-6. Click here for more.
22 Comments:
Quatloos reporting that somebody has accepted the Browns' "show me the law" contest. Why hasn't this been made news here?
http://quatloos.com/qforum/viewtopic.php?t=53
Joey, you can start with the 537 questions at we the people
http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/InfoCenter.htm
Here are all the answers; feel free to match them up against the WTP questions.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/friv_tax.pdf
Check this out! This is amazing...
maybe a bit off subject, however everything interconnects, and relates for the most part.
9/11 Cartoon REMIX (starring Aaron Russo)
http://tinyurl.com/3d9bkw
Here are the answers in the negative from www.givemeliberty.org
Here are the answers to your unofficial answers
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/taxes.htm
INDEX
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION: Page 1
THE INCOME TAX IS A TAX ON LABOR, PROHIBITED BY THE
13
TH
AMENDMENT. ……
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: Page 13
CONGRESS LACKS THE CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO
LEGISLATE AN INCOME TAX ON THE PEOPLE EXCEPT IN THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE US TERRITORIES AND IN THOSE
GEOGRAPHIC AREAS WITHIN ANY OF THE 50 STATES WHERE
THE STATES HAVE SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED IT, IN
WRITING.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION: Page 22
IRS IS PROHIBITED BY THE 4
TH
AND 5
TH
AMENDMENTS FROM
COMPELLING PEOPLE TO COMPLETE, SIGN AND FILE AN
INCOME TAX RETURN FORM 1040.
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Page 26
PERSONAL INCOME TAXES POLARIZE AND DIVIDE AN
OTHERWISE UNITED NATION AND PROMOTE CLASS WARFARE
AND MISTRUST OF OUR GOVERNMENT.
FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Page 31
THE 16
TH
AMEND. DID NOT COME CLOSE TO BEING RATIFIED
BY 3/4THS OF THE STATE LEGISLATURES AS REQUIRED BY
ARTICLE 5; THE INCOME TAX IS, THEREFORE, VIOLATIVE OF
ART I, SEC 9, CL 4
SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Page 55
THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE DOES NOT MAKE MOST
AMERICANS LIABLE TO FILE A TAX RETURN AND PAY AN
INCOME TAX.
SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Page 62
THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE IS VOID FOR VAGNESS
http://famguardian.org
/TaxFreedom/Forms/Discovery
/Deposition/WhyYouAreHere.htm
Click on the Red Pill
to learn the truth
Click on the Blue Pill
to remain ignorant
Somebody has taken Ed and Elaine up on their challenge. Will Ed and Elaine welch on their challenge like Irwin Schiff did?
http://www.quatloos.com/qforum/viewtopic.php?t=53
joey, Why does it matter right now? Have they even answered the contest legitimately?
Please describe to me what you believe in. Do you believe the left boot is better than the right boot on your neck? Have you read any part of the IRC which you are so adamant to defend? Here, pay attention to the word privilege:
"The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income [earnings] as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of tax."
F. Morse Hubbard, Treasury Department legislative draftsman. House Congressional Record March 27th 1943, page 2580
"PRIVILEGE: A particular benefit or advantage enjoyed by a person, company, or class beyond the common advantages of others citizens. An exceptional or extraordinary power of exemption. A particular right, advantage, exemption, power, franchise, or immunity held by a person or class, not generally possessed by others."
Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.
Would that [maybe] mean you and your buds, being a privileged group performing certain acts [of corruption] as a diligent agent of this corruption
Earning money, being paid, etc., in the private sector are NOT privileges[it's a person labor]
What do you beieve in? Are you perfoming a certain act of a sheep following the asshole in front of you?
I know your mentor would be proud..
What luck for the rulers that men do not think.
-Adolf Hitler
...is your mother!?
Hey! What about doing a number on the Feds? Like "show me" the papers that you are tax exempt. (;-) The RSA Ch. 123:1 papers www.state.nh.us (click on the statutes page) do not exist, and so for me to visit the Concord City Tax Collector on Monday to have a property tax bill sent to them by RSA Ch. 123:2 as no April Fool's joke! Yours truly, - -
When anybody who matters cares what you think, please let me know.
Joey, You are repeating yourself.
I think the DOJ computer needs to be reset. It's repeating itself.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/friv_tax.pdf
Joey says here are the answers.
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/taxes.htm
Here is the same document with thruth added. friv_tax_rebuts.pdf
can be found on my shared folder at
http://www.esnips.com/web/bleap
http://digg.com/politics
/1_000_000_if_you_can_show
_Ed_Brown_the_law
1934 DIGGS
$1,000,000 if you can show Ed Brown the law
Ed Brown is offering a $1,000,000 compensation (commercial property) to the first person to show him the law requiring him to pay federal income tax.
Ed and Elaine are cowardly dodging their own challenge.
http://quatloos.com/qforum/viewtopic.php?p=356#356
Joey Smith said...
Ed and Elaine are cowardly dodging their own challenge
http://quatloos.com/
OK JOEY WE HEARD YOU BUT YOU ARE NOT LISTENING. gO TO THE REFUTED faq.
AT http://www.esnips.com/web/bleap
CALLED friv_tax_rebuts.pdf
FOUND AT
http://famguardian.org/Subjects/Taxes/taxes.htm
quatloos.com IS FRIVOLOUS
THIS DOC HAS BEEN SHOT DOWN FOR YEARS NOW. CALL THE DOJ YOURSELF AND ASK THEM ABOUT IT. SEE WHAT THEY SAY. THEN GET BACK TO US WHEN YOU HAVE REAL OPINIONS OF YOUR OWN. INCASE YOU CAN ONLY READ COMPUTER LANGUAGE 010001010010010010010100101010010010101001010100010010100100101001000101011100101100110101011111100101001010010010010010
quatloose is a site FOR RETARDS...
BY RETARDS.
Not to offend Retarded people... Because even they can tell a LIE from the TRUTH.
Let me rephrase that last post.
"FOR RATARDS, BY RATARDS"
There... Now I feel better. I know a Retard Personally. and He's more intelligent than any of the Ratards... Who rely on Quatloose.com for any information at all.
Quatloose.com couldn't even reliably tell You how to pick Your Ratarded Nose!
Site Author... Please feel free to DELETE my last 2 posts.
I'd feel better if you did.
I don't think it's in good taste, even though I meant no Harm. Feelings can be hurt inadvertantly.
Even JOEY'S. ::Laugh::
But seriiously.
Joey, Quit picking Your Nose.
And find US the LAW.
My thanks to the Web Admin.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home