Thursday, March 15, 2007

Offhand comparison stokes courtroom



Judge says Brown likely to spend life in jail

By MARGOT SANGER-KATZ

A federal magistrate has told supporters of Ed and Elaine Brown that Elaine would probably spend the rest of her life in prison.

Read more here.

12 Comments:

Blogger Thurston said...

This is an interesting sign.

Judges fleeing their own court rooms and refusing to comment off the bench on cases that they feel free to comment on while on the bench but not before the court.

Looks like weakness and embarassment to me.

They have actually believed in their inumerable infinite powers, but now it is being shown that such is not true, no matter how many cells they have to fill and guns to bear against the People.

3:10 PM  
Blogger Tyler Moore said...

I'm thinking Brown is right. This whole "democracy of hipocracy" is coming apart at the seems...

And they know it...

3:14 PM  
Blogger Joey Smith said...

Don't do the crime if you don't want to do the time.

The only thing that seems to be "coming apart at the seams" are the Browns, since their support has dwindled to nearly nothing, they have no legal position, their house is about to be forfeited, they welshed on their $1 million challenge, and the Marshals will probably be picking them up about any day now.

Another *success story* for the tax protestor movement!

3:31 PM  
Blogger Anonymous said...

joey is a success story for the slavemasters. Look how well they behave. They go out and do the work without thought. Joey - GO TO HELL

3:45 PM  
Blogger Anonymous said...

Class Action Lawsuit court record and 537 Questions. Anyone who believes in a tax on labor would easily be able to answer these.


Date Description Notes

2006-Oct-27 WTP Files Motion to Expedite Emergency Injunction

2006-Oct-18 WTP Replies to DOJ Response Opposing Injunction

2006-Oct- DOJ Responds to Motion For Injunction (when available)

2006-Oct-6 Transcript Oral Arguments, DC Court of Appeals (when available)

2006-Oct-4 WTP files Emergency Motion for Injunctive Protection
and Declaration By Schulz For affidavit links see web update

2006-Sep DC Court Of Appeals Issues Orders Re Arguments
on Sov. Immunity/Jurisdiction and Oral Argue Schedule USCOA directs parties to argue significant Sovereign Immunity question as it affects establishing jurisidiction

2006-May-8 WTP Reply brief to Government's April 24 Response

2006-Apr-24 DOJ's Response brief opposing the WTP Appeal

2006-Mar-01 Amicus Appellate Brief filed by John Wolfgram Filed late, approval by USCOA pending

2006-Feb-22 WTP files Appeal in U.S. Court of Appeals, Right-click to download. The appeal Tables

2005-Sept-09 WTP files Notice of Appeal
2005-Aug-31 USDC Dismisses RTP Lawsuit Judge rules First Amendment Petition clause VOID

2005-Feb-28 Schulz Sur Reply to 12-21-04 DOJ Reply Brief,
w/ Attachment A
USDC Order Granting WTP Sur Reply
2005-Jan-24 DOJ Motion Opposing Sur Reply
2005-Jan-10 Schulz Motion, & Lane Motion to submit a Sur Reply Cites IRS fraud and that new issues were raised

2004-Dec-21 DOJ Replies to the WTP Opposition Memorandum New issues raised, IRS commits a FRAUD on the Court
2004-Nov-25 DOJ Motions for Additional Time Court grants the DOJ Motion. Now Due on 12/22/04.

2004-Nov-12 WTP files a Second Amended Complaint More plaintiffs added, Affidavits submitted to court
2004-Nov-12 WTP files a Motion to Amend
2004-Nov-12 WTP responds to DOJ's MTD: Memorandum in Opposition

2004-Oct-01 DOJ files a Motion to Dismiss WTP reply due in Nov.

2004 Sept-16 Amended Complaint filed w/ Approx 2000 Named Plaintiffs
2004-Sept-16 Supporting Affidavit of Bob Schulz

2004-Jul-19 Complaint Filed -- CASE # 04-CV01211 Federal District Court, DC
2004-Jul-19 Supporting Affidavit of Bob Schulz Details Petition process to date

2004-Jan-04 Notice of Claim Filed US Federal Court of Claims, (not prosecuted by WTP)

3:48 PM  
Blogger Anonymous said...

US Exporting Fake Democracy -- By Force


Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), September 16, 2005
By Sonali Kolhatkar and Jim Ingalls


The United States has supposedly created new “democracies” in Afghanistan and Iraq, but these endeavors give democracy a bad name. Sure, the two countries have some ingredients of representative democracy, such as elected officials and a constitution. But both countries are still beset by grinding poverty, insurgencies, and entrenched militia forces that make the exercise of democracy either impractical or dangerous. Both countries have high numbers of foreign troops occupying their land and terrorizing the population while hunting “terrorists.” And both countries’ governments answer to their respective U.S. ambassador on most issues. In the midst of such a violent and coercive environment, Afghans are pressing ahead with the latest in a series of “democratic” exercises imposed by the United States: the first Afghan parliamentary elections in four decades will take place this Sunday, September 18. Even though many Afghans hope that the elections will empower them to end their troubles, the fear is that the elections will probably be as undemocratic in practice as every other U.S.-inflicted

http://www.rawa.org/sonali-jim.htm

3:51 PM  
Blogger KOSMIC said...

http://www.opensecrets.org/

follow the money in congress

4:26 PM  
Blogger Tyler Moore said...

Joey, there is plenty of support for the cause over all, nothing is going on right now becausse the Marshels have failed to move in. And they won't...

There are many more people in wait for something to happen, though I'd agree we could use to move this story national.

If the Fed's attack the Brown's the 'Why?' and 'How?' won't matter much. What will matter is this, is that as of that moment, the American People are at war with their own government. Joey, if so many people support your posistion, where are they? There are many more of us that there of you...

What does being 'Free' mean to you Joey? Do you understand what that word means? Do you believe it is something "they" give you, or something you take as a natural right?

And, I disagree that the US action in Iraq and Afganistan are giving democracy a bad name. Mob rule (democracy) already had that to thinking individuals in this world.

What you see in those countries is exactly what democracy brings... Chaos. A land of take what you please from those in the minority.

5:41 PM  
Blogger TruePatriot said...

To the writer, who goes by the name tyler moore, may I suggest that you to pay NO heed or attention to Joey Smith?

The reason is simple... he is ONLY trying to derail a valiant cause here! I assure you he's one of the following:
1) A government agent
2) A professional tax preparer
3) A masochistic sheep

Let We The People become educated & educate. Let us also unite & act with vigor! Let us NOT permit negativity, spewed from the likes joey smith detract from our cause!

10:13 PM  
Blogger Anonymous said...

TruePatriot said...

To the writer, who goes by the name tyler moore, may I suggest that you to pay NO heed or attention to Joey Smith?

Why do some people suggest not responding to Joey. Are they afraid of the results or do they just not like conflict. If someone wants to respond then so what. Directors should go find a porn site. It's like not allowing joey to post because you don't like him or you disagree with him. Personally I try to respond to each of his comments even if it's just a G2H. Grow up.

1:07 AM  
Blogger TruePatriot said...

To the last anonymous writer:
I'm always up for magnanamous battle, as long as I know who the enemy is & the parameters are defined.

joey smith is not worthy of the courageous & righteous cause that most people on this site possess. He only spews biased, spiteful & baselss venom.

Since you have to actually ask why we've suggested not obliging joey smith with our words, then your willful ignorance deserves nothing more than what he has to offer. As a matter of fact, if you're nice enough to him, he'll probably prepare your tax return.

I hope the foregoing words answers your question about being "afraid of conflict." As far as being "afraid of the results," well... I'm only afraid of the results if the majority of the vast populous is as blind & complacent as you are.

Finally, my touché to your suggestion to "grow up" is... I'll grow up when you grow a backbone &/or a brain.

Have an effusive day!

1:24 AM  
Blogger Anonymous said...

TruePatriot said...

To the last anonymous writer:
I'm always up for magnanamous battle, as long as I know who the enemy is & the parameters are defined.

Too Bad, You can't always have it your way. Maybe you should give out your name and address so we can see you are honest in your words, otherwise shut it.

Finally, my touché to your suggestion to "grow up" is... I'll grow up when you grow a backbone &/or a brain.

Insults are the weapon of a weak mind. I'm not complacent or blind. So where you at with that. Use of facts here in this blog is a little shy but come on, I don't even know you. Why would I insult your comments unless I read them, Try doing the same. You are one of those just making it less friendly for everyone and trying to direct the whole thing for your own pleasure. Get off the soap box. Wise up. It's not all about your opinions.

9:51 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

 

SITEMETER