Chuck Conces v. The US Government In "The Court of Public Opinion"

The Court of Public Opinion

March 7, 2007
By Bill Price

Litigants are demanding jury trials. People want their evidence to be heard by a jury of their peers. Chuck Conces demanded a jury trial for the civil lawsuit filed against him by the Department of Justice. We know the lawsuit against Conces and its recent result, of him being remanded to custody for a violation of a “court order” is a charade. We shall see how long this will be able to stand. The Hon. Gordon J. Quist issued an order at the request of DOJ attorneys. Their relentless pursuit to coerce answers without any proof, continues. Where is the evidence that Conces ever did what they are claiming in the first place? But, remember the mantra:

“There was no violation, because there was no civil lawsuit. There was no lawsuit because there was no Authorization.”

IRC Sec.7401; AUTHORIZATION: “No civil action for the collection or recovery of taxes, or of any fine, penalty or forfeiture, shall be commenced unless the secretary (of the Treasury) authorizes the proceedings and the Attorney General or his delegate directs that the action be commenced.”

There are many other reasons that Chuck should have been able get the D.O.J’s phony lawsuit dismissed, but we don’t need to go into any of them. The D.O.J. lied by stating that they had the above authority. The evidence for Chuck Conces’s allegation of fraud is contained in DOJ’s silence. “Silence can only be equated with fraud…” U.S v Tweel

Keep repeating the mantra!

“There was no violation, because there was no civil lawsuit. There was no lawsuit because there was no Authorization.” Click here for more.