SHOW US THE INHERENT LAW: The Magnificent Deception Part 1

Friday, February 02, 2007

The Magnificent Deception Part 1

Please share this far and wide!

7 Comments:

Anonymous said...: Here is a newsmax article on Ron Paul.

Rep. Ron Paul: Running to Win in 2008
Dave Eberhart
Wednesday, Jan. 31, 2007

WASHINGTON -- Libertarians and conservatives alike, frustrated by their early options among the so-called 2008 front-runners, may turn to a familiar face in pursuit of the White House: Rep. Ron Paul.
Paul, R-Texas, has been a fervent advocate of limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency. He's now considering taking his no-nonsense show on the road in an under-the-radar run for the White House.
Paul is an absolute original — never voting for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution. It's an iron rule that sometimes annoys his Republican colleagues.
A medical doctor by training and certification, Paul is nothing if not a thinking man. When he voted against authorizing military force against Iraq, his rationale read like a lawyer's analysis:
"This resolution is not a declaration of war, however, and that is an important point: This resolution transfers the constitutionally-mandated congressional authority to declare wars to the executive branch. This resolution tells the president that he alone has the authority to determine when, where, why, and how war will be declared. It merely asks the president to pay us a courtesy call a couple of days after the bombing starts to let us know what is going on. This is exactly what our Founding Fathers cautioned against when crafting our form of government . . ."
Story Continues Below
The Libertarian Party nominee for president in the 1988 election, Paul favors a non-interventionist foreign policy, is critical of civil liberties being curtailed in the name of the war on terror, voted twice against the Patriot Act, wants no part of a military draft, and would like to see the U.S. pull out of the United Nations.
Such stances by Paul seem to square with the basic libertarian political philosophy that sees every person as the absolute owner of his or her own life — free to do whatever with person or property — as long as such action does not infringe upon the liberty of others.
But this independent thinking man is no slave to a strict libertarian agenda — voting against the Central American Free Trade Agreement (bigger government, he says), supporting border security, and opposing illegal immigration — all postures that would rattle the Libertarian core.
His strongest appeal may be his unblemished and consistent record of opposition to the Iraq War, but is that enough to propel him along with that storied political commodity known as "momentum?"
Spokesman Kent Snyder, the chairman of Paul's exploratory committee and a former staffer on Paul's Libertarian campaign, says that while the congressman knows he's a long shot, his boss is running to win.
Born and raised in Pittsburgh, Pa., Paul graduated from Gettysburg College and the Duke University School of Medicine, before serving as a flight surgeon in the U.S. Air Force during the 1960s. He and his wife Carol moved to Texas in 1968, where he began his medical practice in Brazoria County as a specialist in obstetrics/gynecology.
While serving in Congress during the late 1970s and early 1980s, Paul's limited-government ideals were not popular in Washington. He served on the House Banking committee, where he was a strong advocate for sound monetary policy and an outspoken critic of the Federal Reserve's inflationary measures. He also was an outspoken member of the Gold Commission, advocating a return to a gold standard for our currency.
The Libertarian View
With the mood of the nation today however, Paul's sharp rhetoric may find an eager ear. Here's how a President Ron Paul would address some of the telling issues of the day:
Foreign Aid
"Our annual foreign aid bill is one of the most egregious abuses of the taxpayer I can imagine. Not only is it an unconstitutional burden on America's working families, but this yearly attempt to buy friends and influence foreign governments is counterproductive and actually results in less goodwill toward the United States overseas."
Corruption on Capitol Hill
"Laws addressing bribery, theft, and fraud, already on the books are adequate to deal with the criminal activities associated with lobbying. New laws and regulations are unnecessary.
"Get rid of the evil tax system; the fraudulent monetary system; and the power of government to run our lives, the economy, and the world; and the Abramoff-types would be exposed for the mere gnats they are. There would be a lot less of them, since the incentives to buy politicians would be removed."
Middle East Policy
"Practically speaking, our meddling in the Middle East has only intensified strife and conflict. American tax dollars have militarized the entire region. We give Israel about $3 billion each year, but we also give Egypt $2 billion. Most other Middle East countries get money too, some of which ends up in the hands of Palestinian terrorists. Both sides have far more military weapons as a result. Talk about adding fuel to the fire! Our foolish and unconstitutional foreign aid has produced more violence, not less."
Deficit Spending and Social Security
"Congress [must] stop spending. When Congress outspends federal revenues, it raids Social Security funds to cover the difference. Unless Congress makes real cuts in spending — and stops spending Social Security taxes on completely unrelated programs — millions of Americans simply will not receive even a fraction of the money they paid into Social Security..."
"Under my [plan], your Social Security contributions are set aside in an interest-bearing account and cannot be spent. In other words, your Social Security account would be treated as your account and not a slush fund for Congress."
The Totalization Plan with Mexico
"Our Social Security system already faces trillions of dollars in future shortages as the baby boomer generation retires and fewer young workers pay into the system. Adding hundreds of thousand of non-citizens to the Social Security rolls can only hasten the day of reckoning.
"Social Security never was intended to serve as an individual foreign aid program for non-citizens abroad. Remember, there is no real Social Security trust fund, and the distinction between income taxes and payroll taxes is entirely artificial. The Social Security contributions made by non-citizens are spent immediately as general revenues. So while it's unfortunate that some [non-citizen immigrants] are forced to pay into a system from which they might never receive a penny, the same can be said of younger American citizens."
The Military Draft
"I believe wholeheartedly that an all-volunteer military is not only sufficient for national defense, but also preferable. It is time to abolish the Selective Service System and resign military conscription to the dustbin of American history. Five hundred million dollars have been wasted on Selective Service since 1979, money that could have been returned to taxpayers or spent to improve the lives of our nation's veterans."
Monetary Policy
"Americans must realize that Congress, and the Federal Reserve system that permits the creation of new money by fiat, are the real culprits in the erosion of your personal savings and buying power. Congress relentlessly spends more than the Treasury collects in taxes each year, which means the U.S. government must either borrow or print money to operate — both of which cause the value of the dollar to drop. When we borrow a billion dollars every day simply to run the government, and when the Federal Reserve increases the money supply by trillions of dollars in just 15 years, we hardly can expect our dollars to increase in value."
The NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) Superhighway
"The ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated North American Union — complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy, and virtually borderless travel within the Union. Like the European Union, a North American Union would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty altogether . . .
"[T]he United States should not engage in the construction of a NAFTA superhighway, or enter into any agreement that advances the concept of a North American Union. I wholeheartedly support this legislation, and predict that the superhighway will become a sleeper issue in the 2008 election."
Iran's Nuclear Ambitions
"Rumors are flying about when, not if, Iran will be bombed by either Israel or the U.S. — possibly with nuclear weapons. Our CIA says Iran is 10 years away from producing a nuclear bomb and has no delivery system, but this does not impede our plans to keep ‘everything on the table' when dealing with Iran.
We should remember that Iran, like Iraq, is a third-world nation without a significant military. Nothing in history hints that she is likely to invade a neighboring country, let alone do anything to America or Israel. I am concerned, however, that a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran."
Gun Control
"Tortured interpretations of the Second amendment cannot change the fact that both the letter of the amendment itself and the legislative history conclusively show that the Founders intended ordinary citizens to be armed. The notion that the Second amendment confers rights only upon organized state-run militias is preposterous; the amendment is meaningless unless it protects the gun rights of individuals."
Universal Health Care
"The problems with our health-care system are not the result of too little government intervention, but rather too much. Contrary to the claims of many advocates of increased government regulation of health care, rising costs and red tape do not represent market failure. Rather, they represent the failure of government policies that have destroyed the health care market.
"It's time to rethink the whole system of HMOs and managed care. This entire unnecessary level of corporatism rakes off profits and worsens the quality of care. But HMOs did not arise in the free market; they are creatures of government interference in health care dating to the 1970s. These non-market institutions have gained control over medical care through collusion between organized medicine, politicians, and drug companies, in an effort to move America toward ‘free' universal health care."
Privacy
"The history of abuse of personal information by government officials demonstrates that the only effective means of guaranteeing American's privacy is to limit the ability of the government to collect and store information regarding a citizen's personal matters. The only way to prevent the government from knowing this information is preventing them from using standard identifiers [such as the Social Security number]."
Tax Reform
"Most people understandably want a simpler income tax system, but it's useless to discuss tax reform without spending reform. Who wants a 40 percent flat tax? Who wants a national sales tax if it adds 50 percent to the retail price of everything we buy? In other words, why change the tax structure if spending stays the same? Once we accept that Congress needs $2.7 trillion from us, the only question is how it will be collected.
"The current answer is the labyrinthine tax code, which pits taxpayers against each other in a political scramble to make sure the other guy pays. The truth is that Congress does not need $2.7 trillion, or anything close to it, to fund the proper constitutional functions of the federal government.
"The only tax reform needed is to lower or abolish existing taxes."
Stem Cell Research
"The question that should concern Congress is: Does the U.S. government have the constitutional authority to fund any form of stem cell research? The clear answer to that question is no. A proper constitutional position would reject federal funding for stem cell research, while allowing individual states and private citizens to decide whether to permit, ban, or fund this research."
Emergency Management
"Congress reacted to Katrina in typical Washington-knows-best fashion. It immediately appropriated over $60 billion with no planning or debate, mostly to show that government was "doing something." Political grandstanding masqueraded as compassion.
"As with all rapid government expenditures, the money was spent badly. Every member of Congress must have known that throwing $50 billion at FEMA, the very agency that failed so badly to prepare for Katrina, would not turn out well.
"All federal aid for Katrina should have been distributed as directly as possible to local communities, rather than through wasteful middlemen like FEMA and Homeland Security."
For sure, there's no scratching one's head figuring out where Paul is coming from. His great strength may be in his straight-shooting message — but will he be able to sound his clarion call for what seems like good old honest common sense around the country?
© NewsMax 2007. All rights reserved.; 12:11 PM
Anonymous said...: You took the words out of my mouth.; 1:44 PM
Anonymous said...: The same can be said about half the crap being posted on this blog. The topics should be limited to news about Ed Brown.; 4:51 PM
Anonymous said...: Fred,
What the film is discussing is the fraud perpetrated upon the American and Canadian People and perhaps other nations as well. I know about the United States. This is applicable to Ed Brown’s situation since he is stating that the current federal government does not have jurisdiction in New Hampshire. Technically Ed is correct. Fasten your seat belt while I jumpstart your perceptions of reality and explain the fraud.

I am going to insert here an article defining what a “citizen” actually is then I will give you a very brief overview of the fraud perpetrated on every American and apparently (according to the film) every Canadian citizen.

What is a US Citizen

On the 4th July 1776, everyone in the US became sovereign, as sovereign as a country or King. It was understood that not all people in the US at that time agreed with the revolution and their views had to be respected. So everyone's status was equal as a sovereign individual. It was then open for people to form a group and write the constitution, which would only apply to those that volunteered to be subjected to it, after all, who are they to assume that they can right a constitution on my behalf without my agreement.

The constitution in fact is a set of rules that the government has to abide by, not the people. And notice that they are called the people, not citizens.

This position was never fully written down because it was taken for granted. Later, with the 13th Amendment, it written down, and the 14th Amendment was written to get around the safeguards in the 13th. So what this means is that anyone born in the US is born into the United States of America and is sovereign because the 13th Amendment guarantees that a person cannot be in servitude.

However, the 14th Amendment states that you can volunteer to be a citizen of the United States, but if you do so, you have volunteered to pay off the national debt and loose all your rights as a sovereign person. You become a corporation governed by a corporation. That is why your name on all government documents is in capital letters. Do you also see that as a US citizen you are not protected by the constitution.

Now how did you get to the position that you volunteered to be a US citizen? You did it when you accepted a social security number, something you don't need to be able to work. Or when you applied for a driving license because you signed that you are a US citizen. You see, you are tricked into it, and are kept in the dark as to what your real status is at that time.

Also, when you are born and your parents get the birth certificate, again something you don’t need and not required in the constitution, you become a US citizen.

However, because you are below the age of responsibility, there has to be a way out. That is provided at the age of 18 where anyone can state in writing that they do not wish to be a US citizen. To show you how powerful this is, if they ever reintroduce the draft as is likely in the coming years, if you are called up, go to the medical and wait till it is time to swear in. They will tell you to step forward and swear. It is the act of stepping forward that is the volunteering act, even though you are given the impression that you have to by law and threat of imprisonment, if you do not step forward and demand to know what rights you will lose by stepping forward, they will finish with everyone else and then deal with you by allowing you to go home. Why is this? It is because you are sovereign and not a US citizen, and if this were not honoured, they would be committing treason. Knowledge is everything. Did you know that the government collects old books that explain these rights and destroys them.

Who created the 14th Amendment, and for what purpose?

The U.S. Congress, via the 14th Amendment, created a "citizen/subject" status, which gave equal/civil rights (privilege) to the "freed (enfranchised) slaves" and others who could not qualify to be Sovereign/Citizens. These people could not qualify to be Sovereign/Citizens of the Republic because they were/are not members of the "Posterity" of the "One People" spoken of in the first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence. Therefore, Congress created a Democracy for them! We have a government within a government and a constitution within a constitution, beginning with the 13th amendment.

How can 14th Amendment citizen/subjects (which is a statutory creation of congress) exercise sovereign powers through elected representatives, or in person, when Congress created their citizenship? Remember, Maxim of Law, the created is never greater than the creator. Could that be the explanation why a federal judge could put a freeze on the voters'' decision to not give free education or medical attention to illegal aliens, and the President of the U.S. could send a representative to Mexico to apologize to the President of Mexico for what those voters in California did?

What is the De Jure Citizenship, and where did it come from?

De Jure Citizenship is the heritage (birthright) of the Posterity of "We the People" who ordained and established the Constitution for the United States of America, to secure the "Blessings of Liberty" to themselves and their "Posterity". Congress could not create a citizen/subject status for the Posterity because the Posterity held DeJure Citizenship as their birthright. They inherited the Citizenship status of their parents and ancestors.

How did it happen that so little is known about the De Jure Citizenship?

Little by little, year after year, the De Jure Citizenship has been "presumed" to be the same as the 14th Amendment (de facto) citizen/subject status, and the Unalienable/Inalienable Rights secured by the U.S.Constitution (1787) have been "presumed" to be the same as the equal/civil rights of the 14thAmendment. However, equal does not mean same.

http://attorneysandlaymen.tribe.net/thread/65def77d-59b5-4b37-b7b0-36233cf5b7ad

Here’s the fraud with a VERY brief history of events.

European Royals and bankers had tried from the formation of our REPUBLIC to regain control of the land and the wealth of the new nation, The United States of America a Republic. To do that, they needed to first gain control of the monetary system. American citizens had several bad experiences with “Central banks” formed by this group as they were all corrupt and refused to have any Central Bank system. The “bad guys” for lack of a better term found a work around which is quite simply FRAUD.

IF you look at our Constitution you will find that Congress is the only governmental body which has control of the coining of money and the establishment of its value and it clearly states that the monetary system of the Republic is backed by gold.

On December 23, 1913 (while most of the Congress was out of session) traitors convened a session of Congress and passed the Federal Reserve Act and several other unconstitutional documents. Yes it was opposed. Those who opposed died or were discredited.

The Federal Reserve Act placed the responsibility of the coinage of the money in the hands of “THE FEDERAL RESERVE”. The Federal Reserve despite the implications of its name is not part of the government but in fact a corporation owned by the “bankers” mentioned above. IF you watch Freedom to Fascism they discuss some of this history.

Having gained control of the money system, through the confiscation of the gold and silver coin (formerly legal tender) the Federal Reserve printed paper which in those days were demand notes. In other words you could turn in your “note” and receive gold for it. The bankers had created a system which caused the government of the Republic to have to borrow the money necessary to operate the government from the Federal Reserve.

The Royals and the Bankers orchestrated the First World War, drug the American People into it by the use of a false flag operation (sinking of the Lusitania) and of course created huge amount of war debt. In 1933 they had orchestrated the nation into the Great Depression and ultimately an insolvent government unable to meet its expenses. Enter the “bad guys presidential pick” Roosevelt with his solution to the problem they bad guys had created… the “New Deal”.

The legislation required for the “New Deal” bankrupted the Republic and replaced it with a corporation. The municipal “DEMOCRACY” the UNITED STATES was created in slipped into its place without the People being any the wiser. However, the kicker is that the “corporate government” only has jurisdiction over the territory in which it was incorporated (in this case the District of Columbia) and territories or possession which the “entity” UNITED STATES may own i. e. Puerto Rico etc. Corporations are subject to U.C.C. (Uniform Commercial Code) laws while the states outside the District as well as the People were under the jurisdiction of Common Law which the Constitution is based upon.

The new government could not conduct business with the States, hence the need for the Commerce laws and the incorporation of the states so that the “legal entities” could communicate within the same legal framework. i.e. UCC law.

“The People” who were living breathing human beings are not subject to UCC law so therefore they had to find a way to turn people into corporations. Enter registered birth certificates and Social Security. The registration of the birth certificates and the application “voluntarily” filled out by the individual created a contract which required the uniformity of the legal framework.

To bridge this breach of legal framework, each applicant for social security and each new birth certificate was used to create a corporation which represented the living breathing human being who was subject to Common law.

John Doe without his knowledge had a corporation formed in his name JOHN DOE which being an entity is subject to UCC law. Look at the name on any correspondence you have from the Federal Government… all caps indicating the corporation. The corporation is referred to as a straw man.

The fraud is that the people are made to believe that it is law that you are required to have a birth certificate registered with the state and that you are required to have a social security card in order to work. When you apply for a social security number or your birth certificate is registered with the state it forms a contract. By signing the agreement / contract you without your knowledge you legally forfeit your sovereign status which is yours by birthright and guaranteed by the Constitution (of the Republic). This contract is the necessary legal tool required by the current government to enforce jurisdiction over you.

When you go into court they are prosecuting the straw man not the human being. When you, the living breathing human being respond you are speaking for the straw man. Unfortunately you also voluntarily (without your knowledge) end up taking the consequences for the straw man also.

So above is just another piece to the puzzle and an explanation of why the video was posted and what it has to do with Ed Brown and Federal jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia and possessions and territories.

Don’t jump on this too fast, do the research it is like the income tax illegality. You have to know your facts backwards and forwards, not be a third party to any bankruptcy and be willing to refuse any financial assistance from the Federal government “citizen enticement” programs.; 4:55 PM
Anonymous said...: Conspiracy nuts, unite!; 6:00 PM
Anonymous said...: "Conspiracy nuts unite."

Please take the time to honestly consider whether these things are in fact true. Why do you think they're crazy? Just because so few believe it? That's an illogical argument.; 6:50 PM
Anonymous said...: To the contributor of a brief history. Wow, that is the most articulate, consise and easy to understand explaination of the 14th amendment "citizen slave" I have had the privledge to read. Beautiful piece of work; 6:37 AM

SHOW US THE INHERENT LAW

Friday, February 02, 2007

The Magnificent Deception Part 1

7 Comments:

Contributors

Previous Posts