Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Listen to Ed and Elaine Brown at

Scroll down to "Archived Shows".


Blogger KOSMIC said...

Federal Lawsuit Filed Today Against IRS Is Part of Broad Effort to Provide Information About Agency’s Audit Activities to the Public
IRS Reverses 30 Years of Open-Records Policy, Claims Homeland Security Concerns Prevent Release of Documents

WASHINGTON -- April 14 -- The Internal Revenue Service is illegally withholding information about its operations, claiming without substantiation that some of the unclassified information would compromise homeland security if released to the public, according to a federal lawsuit filed today by Public Citizen on behalf of open-government scholars.

The lawsuit is part of an ongoing effort by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) to obtain statistical information from the IRS about enforcement actions. Reversing 30 years of policy, the IRS under the Bush administration has stonewalled requests for public disclosure of such information.

The IRS for many years has released scores of statistical tables and other information that allowed the American people, Congress, tax lawyers and other interested parties to make their own judgments about how the agency is enforcing the tax laws. But now the IRS is refusing to make public much of this information. In the past, researchers used such information to demonstrate, for example, that wealthy taxpayers are much more successful than poor ones when it comes to reducing the amount of taxes and penalties that the IRS initially claimed they owed in enforcement actions.

Plaintiffs in today’s lawsuit are Susan B. Long and David Burnham, co-directors of TRAC, a non-partisan research center at Syracuse University that disseminates federal government statistical information that is then used by scholars, journalists, public interest groups, lawyers and others to analyze the activities of the government. They are represented in the lawsuit by Scott Nelson of the Public Citizen Litigation Group, which has litigated more than 300 cases under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

“Because a fair, effective and open tax system is so important to the nation, the IRS’s new wave of secrecy about its operations is deeply disturbing and if left uncorrected could well undermine public confidence along with taxpayer compliance,” said Long, associate professor of management information and decision sciences at Syracuse University’s Whitman School of Management. Long has been assessing agency practices for more than 30 years.

“From my research, it appears the IRS is reverting to its habits in the 1950s and 1960s, when secrecy was the norm and the problems of corruption and political abuse were later uncovered by the Congress,” Burnham said. An associate research professor at the Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse, Burnham is a former New York Times investigative reporter and the author of “A Law Unto Itself: Power, Politics and the IRS,” a widely recognized 1990 book about the IRS.

The lawsuit filed today requests information about the IRS’s databases and programs used to generate reports and tabulate statistics. That information would allow Long and Burnham to fully identify IRS record-keeping systems that the agency has long used to provide its senior managers with data about its actual performance.

Despite a consent decree from prior litigation that requires the IRS to make statistical information available to TRAC on a regular, ongoing basis, the IRS has recently balked at releasing the data, asserting that it would have to be specially compiled since the agency no longer keeps basic statistics about audits, appeals and collection activities that would support the agency’s broad assertions about IRS current practices.

Long and Burnham submitted three FOIA requests in November 2004 for information about the IRS’s database, all of which were denied. In two cases, the IRS sent back letters claiming the requested documents had been designated for “Internal Use” only. Nonsensically, the letters said, “We are not [emphasis added] denying the release of the document; it is an agency policy not to release ‘Internal Use’ documents to the public.”

In denying the other request – which sought release of an IRS manual describing information systems used to compile statistical information and numerical measures used to analyze the agency’s operations – the IRS cited “new federal security requirements.” That particular document had in the past been available on the IRS’s public Web site.

“As tax day 2005 looms, it appears that there are now three certainties: death, taxes and improper government reliance on national security as a pretext to stonewall FOIA requests,” said Nelson, the Public Citizen attorney who filed the suit. “Our lawsuit won’t do anything about the first two, but we hope it can help stop the last one.”

The lawsuit claims that there is no valid exemption under FOIA for the IRS’s refusal to release the documents – that agency officials have no authority to designate documents for “Internal Use” only and that the documents fall far outside the scope of statutorily protected “critical infrastructure information” related to homeland security. The plaintiffs also are asking for a court finding that would be a first step toward subjecting responsible agency officials to possible disciplinary action for arbitrarily and capriciously withholding these documents from the public.

To read the lawsuit, click here. For more information about TRAC, click here. For more information about Public Citizen, click here.

12:15 AM  
Blogger KOSMIC said...

Stop American wars by simple living

by Don Schrader May 6, 2003

Many U.S. actors, entertainers and other obscenely rich Americans say and sign "Not in my name" against the U.S. war in Iraq, but they pay far more for war than many minimum wage workers who proudly send their sons and daughters to battle. How much good is it to proclaim "Not in my name" unless that means "Not with my money."

In 1982, Secretary of State Alexander Haig said of anti-war protesters, "Let them demonstrate all they want as long as they pay their taxes."

If a father gives his son a switchblade how can the father be shocked if his son eventually stabs someone? Many U.S. peace activists for decades have paid thousands of dollars to the U.S. war machine. So how can they be shocked when the U.S. empire uses weapons purchased by the peace activists to murder worldwide? We get what we pay for.

No job, no salary, no relationship, no degree, no car, no house, no art, no furniture and no gadget are worth paying federal income tax to rob, terrorize, blind, cripple, paralyze, make homeless and murder our sisters and brothers in Iraq and worldwide.

The main purpose of the U.S. war machine is to make sure most Americans, especially the greediest, keep on stealing and hogging the wealth of the world.

The best way to boycott the U.S. war machine, with no fines and no threats from the IRS, is to live simply — below the taxable level.

The taxable level this year for me, a single, sighted, under 65-year-old person is $7,800. I lived well last year on $3,760.

I have owned no car since I returned to Albuquerque in 1988. The last time I rode in any car was more than two years ago. I hate cars because I hate wars for oil, poisoned air, the horrors of global warming and highways smothering fertile soil. I love to walk!

I would not trade my 12'x 15' apartment for the most luxurious mansion in the world.

I am glad to have no refrigerator, no business suit, no credit cards, no phone, no microwave and no air conditioner. I am glad I consume no booze, no cigarettes, no dairy, no junk food, no meat, no cooked food, no illegal drugs and no prescription drugs.

I yearn for a passionate, lifelong romance with a man but I will not surrender, I will not compromise my war tax refusal and my living simply for any man on Earth.

I refused to be a soldier in 1969 during the Vietnam War. For me as a conscientious objector to pay federal income tax to train other Americans, largely the poor and people of color, to become professionally hired killers to murder on command with no conscience would be more evil than becoming a soldier myself.

My life is an all-out public boycott of the U.S. empire every day as long as I live.

Gandhi said, "Be the change you want to see in the world ... My life is my message."

12:30 AM  
Blogger TruePatriot said...

The IRS is guilty. The Federal Reserve is guiltier. The International Bankers are even guiltier, yet...

Finally, the BASTARD POLITITIANS, who the public has entrusted to serve the best interest of WE THE PEOPLE, are THE GUILTIEST for selling us out... selling this country out to den of vipers!!!

12:46 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home