487ptown Supports Ed Brown
There is no law which requires you to file an income tax return for working in America.
http://www.487ptown.com/
posted by The Freedom Fellowship at
12:37 PM
Sunday, February 25, 2007
There is no law which requires you to file an income tax return for working in America.
http://www.487ptown.com/
Sign the Ed and Elaine Petition
(click on image for addresses)
PLEASE WRITE TO Ed & Elaine!
Let them know that we still care!
To contribute to their commissary accounts,
GO TO the links below and click on "Inmate money page"
Click here to contribute to Ed's commissary account
Click here to contribute to Elaine's commissary account
Click here to read the legal pleadings in Ed & Elaine's case
Click here to read about the great "capstone right" of We The People: our "Right To Petition"
Click here to read about the Right-to-Petition “V” Protest
*****************************
If you have not already done so, please register an account at MakeTheStand.com so that we may alert you to important news alerts regarding the Ed & Elaine stand.
*****************************
Business Speaker
ShowEdTheLaw.com
Aaron Russo RIP
1943 - 2007
Contributors
Previous Posts
- Letter To The Editor
- Letter to Richard W. Mann
- Jonathan Kovar Is Confused
- RonPaulExplore.com
- From The Reader Comments
- Gene Chapman and Doug Kenline Talk About Ed Brown
- 2007 Liberty Forum
- Comment on Ed Brown Interview by Sandman
- Audioblog Report From David Ridley
- To all Americans and so-called "tax professionals"
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
11 Comments:
Oh yes there is such a law, see
http://hereisthelaw.blogspot.com
Then go get your PRIZE from Ed and Elaine brother!
xoxo
There is NO prize, since their challenge is totally illusory because they put up two buildings that are subject to forfeiture and sale to satisfy the Browns' criminal penalties and their back taxes.
Have them escrow $1,000,000 into a bank account and then they can say there is a challenge. Until then, it is just so much hot air.
How much would you give for a building that is subject to civil forfeiture proceedings and a tax sale? NOTHING, and that is exactly what the "challenge" is worth.
Joey,
I am going over your blog now.
I like healthy debate. I don't believe in a one sided "I'm right, you're wrong" attitude.
I'll get back to you.
Ronnied
Am I the only one or do others here recognize that joey's writing style is the same as Richard W. Mann's?
I guess I am confused. Is it really okay to us law-abiding citizens that two tax-evading losers who have been tried and found guilty by a jury of their peers are sitting at home taunting the system that you and I hold sacred? (Only if you are an IRS agent would you agree with this statement)
This is not a puppet nation. Does Ed Brown really think he is going to be allowed to sit home forever acting like the rule of law will never find him? (Ed Brown is honoring the rule of law unlike the courts of today)
Does anyone else think this is pure nonsense? (Only the IRS and DOJ)
Where is our firm and efficient process of justice? (It went out the wondow joey, with the ...
PATTERN CRIMINAL
JURY INSTRUCTIONS
_______________
Chapter 1.00
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Committee Commentary 1.02
2005 Edition
The Committee made no change in the instruction.
A panel of the Sixth Circuit quoted paragraph (4) of this instruction and stated that it cured any confusing statements made by the district court during voir dire. United States v. Okeezie, 1993 WL 20997 at 4, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 1968 at 4 (6th Cir. 1993)(unpublished).
1991 Edition
The jurors have two main duties. First, they must determine from the evidence what the facts are. Second, they must take the law stated in the court's instructions, apply it to the facts and decide whether the facts prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt. See Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 51, 102-107, 15 S.Ct. 273, 39 L.Ed. 343 (1895); Starr v. United States, 153 U.S. 614, 625, 14 S.Ct. 919, 923, 38 L.Ed. 841 (1894).
The jurors have the power to ignore the court's instructions and bring in a not guilty verdict contrary to the law and the facts. Horning v. District of Columbia, 254 U.S. 135, 138, 41 S.Ct. 53, 54, 65 L.Ed. 185 (1920).
But they should not be told by the court that they have this power.
United States v. Krzyske, 836 F.2d 1013, 1021 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832, 109 S.Ct. 89, 102 L.Ed.2d 65 (1988); United States v. Avery, 717 F.2d 1020, 1027 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 905, 104 S.Ct. 1683, 80 L.Ed.2d 157 (1984); United States v. Burkhart, 501 F.2d 993, 996-997 (6th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 946, 95 S.Ct. 1326, 43 L.Ed.2d 424 (1975).
They should instead be told that it is their duty to accept and apply the law as given to them by the court. United States v. Avery, supra at 1027.
Where do these two losers get off thinking they can avoid paying their fair share of the tax burden and thumb their noses at all of us?
Joey Smith = Richard Mann
My Dad once said to me..... "Don't argue with an idiot, they bring you down to their level and bet you with experience." :)
You can't argue with a drunk either because they argue even when you try to agree with them. It's that state of mind like Joey's. She is just a kid who likes to argue with people on blogs. Doesn't work, lives with mom and probable is on disability or living off a settlement of some kind or on social security.
Why are you people burning calories responding to this illusory haha joey smith??? it's intellectually degrading.
There's nothing left for Joey to do except to Become Further Enslaved in Lies and Treachery, or to Believe in the Constitution and let it set Him Free.
People just like Ed and Elaine Brown Laid their Lives down long ago, in order to make the Constitution a Reality for YOU and ME.
Ed Brown is willing to Lay down his Life at this very moment, to ensure that We and Our Children, can continue to Live by the Constitution, and Prevent the Destruction of this Nations very Foundation.
There is only one Definition of a PATRIOT in my Book. "Any individual who is willing to lay down their Life in order to Preserve the Constitution of the United States of America in its entire, original, un-corrupted Language...
In other Words, to Die in order to Uphold the Constitution itself... Not the Internal Revenue Code!
A True Patriot's DUTY... Is to Uphold the CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES...
Screw the Internal Revenue Code! I would not lay down My Life Defending such Slavery and Oppression. I would not DIE for the IRS or the IRC.
I would however, Lay down my Life Defending the Constitution Against it!
All you Joey Smiths out there, couldn't even carry a TRUE PATRIOT'S lunch.
Hmmmmm, seems like whenever there is a post that mentions the reward for showing the tax law little Joey comes in to try and discredit it claiming there is no money.
Joey - There's a hell of a lot more money available for this challenge that Ed Browns property. How come you always leave that bit of info out of your posts?
We the people foundation has had 50k available for years now. There's also many other individuals who have put up funds for the challenge. Of course you always neglect to mention that.
Joey - For someone who hates the browns, the fair tax movement, this blog, the people posting etc, etc, you sure spend a lot of time here.
I wonder why that is?
Your true colors show blindingly.
As for your constant crap about the 16th amendment... it does not matter if the 16th was ratified or not (not) because its been clearly ruled already that the 16th amendment gives the government NO new taxing powers. What part of NO NEW TAKING POWERS don't you understand?
Here's a question for you Joey:
Why do you hang out on this blog all day long every day?
Why are you afraid to do a radio interview? And yes you are AFRAID to go on the air with your so called facts.
You a pathetic excuse for an American!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home