Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Prokop Family Catalog Supports Ed Brown

Thanks to reader in reader comments. See website here...

http://www.prokop.net/

Enter your Email





Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Theft by Deception by Larken Rose



http://web6.streamhoster.com/vinyasi/stream/theft-by-deception/broadband/700K/Theft-by-Deception_all.asx

2:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

861 Evidence movie


http://web6.streamhoster.com/vinyasi/stream/861_Evidence/broadband/index.html

4:11 AM  
Blogger FredMarshall1937 said...

http://web6.streamhoster.com/vinyasi/stream/861_Evidence

You are not authorized to view this page

You might not have permission to view this directory or page using the credentials you supplied.

-----

If you believe you should be able to view this directory or page, please try to contact the Web site by using any e-mail address or phone number that may be listed on the web6.streamhoster.com home page.

You can click Search to look for information on the Internet.

HTTP Error 403 - Forbidden
Internet Explorer

5:52 AM  
Blogger FredMarshall1937 said...

Does anyone have a link to the 861 Evidence video THAT WORKS? I still have about 50 of the mini-CD's but I never knew it was available on the Internet after Larken was convicted.

5:54 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why bother? 861 doesn't work; never has and never will. Larken himself abandoned it before his trial and proceeded on a Cheek defense instead. Ditto for Dr. Tom Clayton.

The creator of the 861 theory, Thurston Bell, is selling used cars in Florida. His co-creator, Rick Haraka, is also out of business.

None of these four took the opportunity when presented to argue 861 to the court. Nobody else has done so successfully, and most who have tried have been slammed with large penalties of up to $15,000 just for arguing it, which were affirmed on appeal.

Only the dumbest of the dumb still think that 861 might work.

10:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why don't you state WHY the 861 arguments among many others gets closed down. Wait, let me save you a breath.

They get shut down because the courts don't allow the evidence in so it cannot possibly be argued.

Why is Ed Brown taking a stand?

One main reason is because of this sad fact. The courts are a huge part of the problem. They are not allowing evidence in to be argued.

How can you possibly have a fair trial if you cannot present the evidence that counts?

So please - when you come in here and state something does not work, make sure you state WHY it does not work.

You and people like you are another part of the problem because you try and treat and dispute the symptoms instead of looking at the real problem, which is the entire fraudulent federal reserve, IRS and corrupt justice system.

Critical Reading For Critical Thinkers (beware if you're a typical boob tube conditioned mind slave):

http://www.givemeliberty.org/

http://www.givemeliberty.org/education.htm

http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/

http://yannone.blogspot.com/2006/08/jury-that-took-on-irs.html

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198

Can you answer these questions?
http://www.givemeliberty.org/NoRedress/HistoricalDocs/StatementBeliefs2Up26pgs.PDF

http://www.stopthelie.com/

11:16 AM  
Blogger Thurston said...

Let's see. 861 Worked for Gene Webb before Judge Ann Conway. That is why I went forward alone and embraced people's cry to pay attention to the 8275 and 4852 Forms.

THe Cheek defense is the open door to bring the individual's understanding of the law into the proceedings as a defense.

As shown in the Third and Fourth points of the Law Review Article of John Wolfgram in the SUmmer of 2000, http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Research/WolfgramJudiciaryStoleRTP.htm
it is clearly shown what was goign to happen to all of us, and the eventual foreign terrorist attacks that would come. Such is just the results of the logic of War being applied by a Nation against its citizens and its laws.

In the article he clearly stated that the government uses criminal laws to squelch petitions, damaging the first amendment, and the judges never rule on the mertis of the speech. They ignore what is said, thus ignorign the law to do the will of the government.

There are 6 other :aw Journal Review Articles posted by WTP that show precisely the same thing and some older than Wolfgram's, so he was neither an instigator of ideas, nor alone.

SInce the substance of the law does not matter anymore to the courts, as Wolgram said and the Schiff, Bell, Rose, Simkanin and other case prove, the final frontier is JURISDICTION.

Now that the Congress is about to be destroyed by the Executive Branch once and for all over Iraq, we will see the full measure of the Dictatorship of the Executive, and Jurisdiction will not matter either.

THen again, the 4th Cir. in the SAPF Abusive Tax Shelter case read the Riot Act to the Trial Judge for his ruling because of the prior 1995 case where it was determined that SAPF was a First Amendemnt organization (res judicata), and it is also pointed out on appeal that the Judge's ruling was all about speech regarding 861 which SAPF did not promote, and no evidence or argument of such speech was ever made. He just cookie cut the Trial judge's ruling in my case and enjoined SAPF.

See folks, just as so well proved, even in the Border Patrol Officer's case, there is no more rule of law, due process, or justice anymore, even Lou Dobbs and CNN know this and have talked of it.

Nobody's argument was ever wrong. None were ever actually adjudged. Each ruling just shut down that means of petition reasoning until they decided to shut down the Petition organizers.

Wolfgram saw it clearly.

Jurisdiction is the final frontier, yet the cases so far seem to show that the rule of law is DEAD, and thus nothing may be heard. One little case of William Wallace Lear gave me a ray of hope for the Jurisdiction issue, and I have a filing before the FDC in MD.

If Congress presses the Iraq matter in War Powers v. Congressional Const. War Delaration Power, the issue will be Executive Fiat v. Acts of Congress. This will support my filing with evidence and admissions of the USSCT that the IRS was never created by an Act of Congress.

If Congress wins the Iraq struggle, Justice, Rule of law, and Jurisdiction will have hope of winning. If thye lose, Congress is a lame duck forever, the vote is obliterated, and martial law is the Rule because the Acts of Congress do not matter.

I think we will see the latter is the case.

11:43 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

All these new laws that have been put in place to make it easier to start up martial law are put in place because the powers that be see the people becoming restless.

Ed Brown is one of MANY.

The justice system is beyond repair and is need of rebuilding.

And since we're on the topic of "problems" here's where the majority of the problems start - right in congress:

Kiss your country goodbye -

Traitorous Congress
Senate Vote Vs English As Official Language & Give Illegals SSI
1-28-7


Shocking Senatorial Votes

The following senators voted against making English the official language of America :


Akaka (D-HI)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Domenici (R-NM)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

Now, the following are the senators who voted to give illegal aliens
Social Security benefits. They are grouped by home state. If a state
is not listed, there was no voting representative.


Alaska: Stevens (R)
Arizona: McCain (R)
Arkansas: Lincoln (D) Pryor (D)
California: Boxer (D) Feinstein (D)
Colorado: Salazar (D)
Connecticut: Dodd (D) Lieberman (D)
Delaware: Biden (D) Carper (D)
Florida: Martinez (R)
Hawaii: Akaka (D) Inouye (D)
Illinois: Durbin (D) Obama (D)
Indiana: Bayh (D) Lugar (R)

Iowa: Harkin (D)
Kansas: Brownback (R)
Louisiana: Landrieu (D)
Maryland: Mikulski (D) Sarbanes (D)
Massachusetts: Kennedy (D) Kerry (D)
Montana: Baucus (D)
Nebraska: Hagel (R)
Nevada: Reid (D)
New Jersey: Lautenberg (D) Menendez (D)
New Mexico: Bingaman (D)
New York: Clinton (D) Schumer (D)

North Dakota: Dorgan (D)
Ohio: DeWine (R) Voinovich(R)
Oregon: Wyden (D)
Pennsylvania: Specter (R)
Rhode Island: Chafee (R) Reed (D)
South Carolina: Graham (R)
South Dakota: Johnson (D)
Vermont: Jeffords (I) Leahy (D)
Washington: Cantwell (D) Murray (D)
West Virginia: Rockefeller (D), by Not Voting
Wisconsin: Feingold (D) Kohl (D)

Every one of them should be kicked to the curb.

12:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Go to www.prokop.net for links to AFTF, 861 Evidence movie and theft by deception movie. I will be posting a link to a list of google and youtube movies shortly.

The information is valid. It's only because of stupid corrupt judges and Dept of Injustice that we are losing. Things will change one way or another. It's my way or it's Ed's way. Even if it means death or imprisonment.
Bob

5:36 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

 

SITEMETER