Comment from Fred Marshall

"I am NOT anti-government. I am anti-BAD-government and anti-CORRUPT-government." - Fred Marshall

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Conclusion: There are no significant differences between the behaviors of Whitey Harrell and Ed and Elaine Brown. The laws which apply to them are the same. The laughable "evidence" presented against them in court was the same. Yet Harrell was found not guilty and the Browns were found guilty. The difference was simply the juries, nothing more. One defendant was released, the others' lives ruined forever. Only in America!"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As I write this, another government Gestapo siege is developing, this time near Concord, New Hampshire, where the state's official motto is "Live free or die."

Quest for Fair Trial in Concord, NH
http://questforfairtrialinconcordnh.blogspot.com/

Summary of events to date:

Ed and Elaine Brown complied with the law. They didn't file or pay federal income taxes the past ten years because THE LAW SAYS, and the Constitution says, their domestic income is NOT SUBJECT TO TAXATION by the federal government, despite the government's knowingly false implications and insistence the past 90 years....and the general population's mistaken belief....that "everyone must pay their fair share."

The Browns were indicted on multiple trumped-up tax-related charges (as are hundreds of Americans each year, especially in the three months leading up to April 15). They went to trial where they were not permitted to present much of the evidence that would have proven their innocence, or proven to the jury what the law ACTUALLY SAYS. Last Thursday they realized they were being denied a fair trial in court (the judge had denied their motion for a fair trial), so they elected to stay home Friday instead of returning to court, and die if necessary rather than succumbing to the government extortion and tyranny the rest of America accepts as routine.

Monday was a holiday. Though they had vowed to remain at home and fight to their deaths, the pressure of the situation motivated Elaine (a dentist) to cave in, and she returned to court on Tuesday. She rejected a plea bargain offer and elected to take her chances in persuading the jury she had violated no law. The trial resumed, with Elaine present and with Ed being tried concurrently in absentia. The uninformed jury, cleverly manipulated by the government prosecutors, found the Browns guilty of all charges

Note: Contrast this case with the Whitey Harrell story that follows this one, in which an INTELLIGENT jury acquitted him of similar charges because the government could not produce...when the jury asked for it....any law requiring him to file or pay federal income taxes. Government prosecutors cannot show a law that doesn't exist, all they can do is mislead and manipulate ignorant juries. That is the only way they get convictions in the 85% of the cases they "win." Unfortunately for America, only 15% of innocent defendants are lucky enough to get juries containing one or two intelligent jurors who steadfastly and properly insist the government must prove its case (what a novel concept!).

Now Ed Brown stands alone, at the Brown home, to face whatever comes. He's not really alone, many fellow informed citizens and patriots are there, presumably to stand with him. To what extent and for how long remains to be seen.

Meanwhile, the media are gathering around the scene to await the government's arrival. It'll be interesting to see what rogue government agencies will show up, and which will assume the lead role. Will the DEA show up and falsely claim there must be some illegal drugs on the premises? Will the BATF be there and falsely claim Ed must surely have some illegal weapons? Will the FBI take charge and justify their presence by claiming the government has been defrauded? Will the county sheriff permit all this to happen, or will he properly perform his duty and protect his county residents from illegally invading federal forces with no jurisdiction or authority inside his county?

Click on the link above and follow the events as they unfold.

Now for the Whitey Harrell story.

This is a MUST listen. You can click on LISTEN below, then minimize the small audio screen that appears, and go on with what you are doing while you listen.

This is an episode of the Peter McCandless (Ph.D.) Radio show (known as the Perter-Mac show) from last August. His guest is a WONDERFULLY INTELLIGENT lady named Marcy Brooks, a lady who sat on a jury in a case where a man, Whitey Harrell, was being tried on four counts of WILLFUL FAILURE TO FILE A TAX RETURN.

This will give you an insight as to just how CROOKED tax trials really are, and to what lengths judges and prosecutors COLLABORATE and routinely go to keep the LAW out of the courtroom and CONVICT people they KNOW ARE INNOCENT, simply by DELIBERATELY misleading UNINFORMED juries.

Although this is a case tried in Illinois state court, regarding state income taxes, this trial nonetheless addresses the same issues because Illinois state law stipulates that "anyone required to file a federal return is required to file an Illinois return." As Marcy Brooks noted in this audio interview, that also means "if a person is NOT required to file a federal return, then he is NOT required to file an Illinois return."

Though Marcy Brooks was not the foreperson of the jury, she was clearly intelligent, ALERT and outspoken. She went into the jury box knowing nothing, but soon detected the railroad job that was being attempted and she asked questions. She even raised her hand during the trial and directed a question to the judge, something 99.9% of jurors mistakenly believe jurors aren't allowed to do. Near the end of the interview, she gives some GREAT guidance to future jurors. In fact, throughout the interview there are points that will curl the toes of most people. This is a quote from her interview:

"I have never felt more humbled, and more proud at the same time, in my life. I remember thinking as our verdict was being read, 'The system may not work all the time; but THIS time, for THAT man, it DID.' "

She also describes a scene from a documentary she had seen and she quotes Adolf Hitler when he tells a crowd of tens of thousands "You don't have to THINK...I will think FOR you," and the crowd cheered jubilantly. How frightening it is to realize that too many Americans refuse to think, and are apathetically content to let the government think for them.

Bottom line is that this interview IS NOT TO BE MISSED by any decent, intelligent American who claims to care for individual rights under the Constitution. But for the grace of God, YOU could be the defendant in such a kangaroo court, on most any charge you can imagine.

Note: In order to copy and paste the hyperlinks below, I had to paste entire paragraphs containing them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Others might hope that at least one of the jurors had the wisdom and character of Marcy Brooks, a juror who questioned the federal government's startling inability to identify the statute that would make most Americans liable for an unapportioned direct tax like the "income tax." (Marcy Brooks' jury delivered four "not guilty" verdicts as a result.) [Listen]

Gather your friends and family and listen as juror Marcy Brooks recounts what happened when two prosecutors, a judge, and the IRS meet an intelligent, responsible jury in the tax trial of Whitey Harrell.

[Part 1] [Part 2]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Conclusion: There are no significant differences between the behaviors of Whitey Harrell and Ed and Elaine Brown. The laws which apply to them are the same. The laughable "evidence" presented against them in court was the same. Yet Harrell was found not guilty and the Browns were found guilty. The difference was simply the juries, nothing more. One defendant was released, the others' lives ruined forever.

Only in America! Will YOU be the government's next victim?

Fred Marshall

From reader comments.