Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Sign the Ed and Elaine Petition
(click on image for addresses)
PLEASE WRITE TO Ed & Elaine!
Let them know that we still care!
To contribute to their commissary accounts,
GO TO the links below and click on "Inmate money page"
Click here to contribute to Ed's commissary account
Click here to contribute to Elaine's commissary account
Click here to read the legal pleadings in Ed & Elaine's case
Click here to read about the great "capstone right" of We The People: our "Right To Petition"
Click here to read about the Right-to-Petition āVā Protest
If you have not already done so, please register an account at MakeTheStand.com so that we may alert you to important news alerts regarding the Ed & Elaine stand.
*****************************
Business Speaker
ShowEdTheLaw.com
Aaron Russo RIP
1943 - 2007
Contributors
Previous Posts
- FORMER IRS SPECIAL AGENT GOING TO D.C.
- Man staying with tax-evading couple taken to hospital
- On the Shoulders of Patriots
- Ron Paul Links To Chuck Baldwin
- Massive E-mail Drive Gets Noticed
- Ed Brown Posts Bill Price Article
- AFTF Google Video Comment...
- ED BROWN REFUSED TO PARTAKE IN A FEDERAL TRIAL WHE...
- Organized Crime
- Petitions for Redress Served
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
1 Comments:
$1 Million Challenge Details
http://reopen911.org/Contest.htm
This is void where prohibited by law: including but not limited to Colorado , Maryland , Nebraska , North Dakota, Vermont, New Jersey and Tennessee. It is void anywhere prohibited by law.
The contest page supercedes all previous ones and all previous offers are withdrawn. 3-September-2006. Only four significant changes have been made since the beginning except for clarification, (a) point 12, about molten steel. b) We equate exotic weapons as "explosives" (you do not have to prove that exotic weapons were not used. But you cannot claim the prize if you do prove that exotic weapons were used). c) The renaming of this offer as a challenge and not a contest. d) all evidence and points presented by Scholars for Truth, Professor Jones, and Morgan Reynolds must be refuted and are included in the requirements, and [newest] e) the radiation contents of the dust must be explained.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home