When I post I make it clear where the material comes from. I do not suggest these ideas are mine alone. My feeling is that I want to be honest with the government and I am doing my part. But to play games, file paper without proven method and using what some communist call tax shelters or protester arguments, is just asking for trouble. At first I though joining We The People class action at givemeliberty.org and telling the IRS I would not pay along with a zero return was good enough. It is NOT. My goal is to stay away from the statutes that have Prison time attached, as long as I can and still make my beliefs known to the IRS and not be paying what I do not owe. Also, any time you file paper with the government you should know you are expected to be fully aware of all details in regards to it. Something fery few of us can. Again, I will try harder to put the source of any cut and paste, but then there is very little in this world that is truly original. What's old is new, What's new is old. Around and around we go.
For anyone who wishes to further argue the details you can email me at log2arcsine@yahoo.com, search for me on yahoo groups or check out my blog at http://bleap.blogspot.com/
Thats the post. Sorry you forget where you came in. Also see other post back a ways where I answer your concern the first time. I enjoyed the motion to dismiss by cryer post on the we the people web site. Don't you have anything better to do. You don't want me to start picking your posts apart.
I agree with Fred here... I myself have been guilty once or twice of not giving such credit... But not intentionally. and It is good Blog etiquit to do so... I have Given Credit where Credit is due on Several other of My Posts... But in all... Fred is absolutely right.
To Respect Someone for their work, or to Admire it... is to give them Credit for it. (I don't know if anyone else ever said that... But I just did.)
Again, As you can see from the heading this is the door I came through and the reason for the posts. If you follow through and read Cryer's motion to dismiss you will know were I got the post I left. Maybe Fred is one of those who thinks everyone should add ALL RIGHTS RESERVED at the end of everything. But since I use a made up name as most others do who the hell cares anyways. I post what I want and where. You don't like it then maybe it is a reflection of yourself more than an opinion of me. I gave no indication that I wrote it, I just forgot to add the link to Schulz's and MINE web site.
TO:....."but CTC also tells you to file as Nonresident alien" YOU ARE WRONG MY FRIEND. HE NEVER STATES THAT!!! YOU HAVEN'T READ THE BOOK. I THOUGHT I HAD, AND COULDN'T ACCEPT THE "NR" THING, BUT THIS PROCES TAKES FORTITUDE. --HE SAYS---- "By The Way... Do you imagine that you know what 'Cracking the Code-...' says without having read the book? -------------You're wrong" - -TO: "What does "CTC" mean? -Ctc {cracking the code]
Where can "the class action law suit" be found, the entire law suit is there - - and what is its subject matter?" - the answer. after you thoroughly read and understand the process. It all makes sense.And it's scary that its that simple.
Cryer is the brilliant one who prepared and filed the Memorandum. But in Kosmic's post, it appears that Kosmic is sharing some of his wisdom and research with us. The legal word for that is PLAGIARISM. I'd bet 99% of the readers here AGREE.
OK Fred you done being stupid now. Quit putting your ward in my mouth. You can't accept my apology for forgetting a link then you are an ass. Grow up. And I have read CTC and I bought 20 and gave them away. What have you done to help the cause. I have done more than you ever will just sitting on your ass at the computer. Get up and move around once and a while. It's critics like you that give us all a bad name, run your mouth some more.
If you have not already done so, please register an account at MakeTheStand.com so that we may alert you to important news alerts regarding the Ed & Elaine stand.
7 Comments:
When I post I make it clear where the material comes from. I do not suggest these ideas are mine alone. My feeling is that I want to be honest with the government and I am doing my part. But to play games, file paper without proven method and using what some communist call tax shelters or protester arguments, is just asking for trouble. At first I though joining We The People class action at givemeliberty.org and telling the IRS I would not pay along with a zero return was good enough. It is NOT. My goal is to stay away from the statutes that have Prison time attached, as long as I can and still make my beliefs known to the IRS and not be paying what I do not owe. Also, any time you file paper with the government you should know you are expected to be fully aware of all details in regards to it. Something fery few of us can. Again, I will try harder to put the source of any cut and paste, but then there is very little in this world that is truly original. What's old is new, What's new is old. Around and around we go.
For anyone who wishes to further argue the details you can email me at log2arcsine@yahoo.com, search for me on yahoo groups or check out my blog at http://bleap.blogspot.com/
From: "News Report From Bob Schulz" thread.
Thats the post. Sorry you forget where you came in. Also see other post back a ways where I answer your concern the first time. I enjoyed the motion to dismiss by cryer post on the we the people web site. Don't you have anything better to do. You don't want me to start picking your posts apart.
I agree with Fred here... I myself have been guilty once or twice of not giving such credit... But not intentionally. and It is good Blog etiquit to do so... I have Given Credit where Credit is due on Several other of My Posts... But in all... Fred is absolutely right.
To Respect Someone for their work, or to Admire it... is to give them Credit for it. (I don't know if anyone else ever said that... But I just did.)
KOSMIC said...
"News Report From Bob Schulz"
Again, As you can see from the heading this is the door I came through and the reason for the posts. If you follow through and read Cryer's motion to dismiss you will know were I got the post I left. Maybe Fred is one of those who thinks everyone should add ALL RIGHTS RESERVED at the end of everything. But since I use a made up name as most others do who the hell cares anyways. I post what I want and where. You don't like it then maybe it is a reflection of yourself more than an opinion of me. I gave no indication that I wrote it, I just forgot to add the link to Schulz's and MINE web site.
TO:....."but CTC also tells you to file as Nonresident alien"
YOU ARE WRONG MY FRIEND. HE NEVER STATES THAT!!! YOU HAVEN'T READ THE BOOK. I THOUGHT I HAD, AND COULDN'T ACCEPT THE "NR" THING, BUT THIS PROCES TAKES FORTITUDE.
--HE SAYS---- "By The Way...
Do you imagine that you know what 'Cracking the Code-...' says without having read the book?
-------------You're wrong"
-
-TO:
"What does "CTC" mean?
-Ctc {cracking the code]
Where can "the class action law suit" be found,
the entire law suit is there
-
-
and what is its subject matter?"
-
the answer. after you thoroughly read and understand the process. It all makes sense.And it's scary that its that simple.
Cryer is the brilliant one who prepared and filed the Memorandum. But in Kosmic's post, it appears that Kosmic is sharing some of his wisdom and research with us. The legal word for that is PLAGIARISM. I'd bet 99% of the readers here AGREE.
OK Fred you done being stupid now. Quit putting your ward in my mouth. You can't accept my apology for forgetting a link then you are an ass. Grow up. And I have read CTC and I bought 20 and gave them away. What have you done to help the cause. I have done more than you ever will just sitting on your ass at the computer. Get up and move around once and a while. It's critics like you that give us all a bad name, run your mouth some more.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home