Monday, February 12, 2007

Is Verichip the Mark ?

Thanks to reader in reader comments.


Blogger FredMarshall1937 said...

Section 7701. Definitions

(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof -
(16) Withholding agent - The term "withholding agent" means any person required to deduct and withhold any tax under the provisions of section 1441, 1442, 1443, or 1461.

Section 1441. Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens

Section 1442. Withholding of tax on foreign corporations

Section 1443. Foreign tax-exempt organizations

Section 1444. Withholding on Virgin Islands source income

Section 1445. Withholding of tax on dispositions of United States real property interests by a foreign person...

Section 1446. Withholding tax on foreign partners' share of effectively connected income

Section 1447 - 1460. Repealed.

Section 1461. Liability for withheld tax - Every person required to deduct and withhold any tax under this chapter is hereby made liable for such tax and is hereby indemnified against the claims and demands of any person for the amount of any payments made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.

Editor's note: The requirement in Section 1461 above is IDENTICAL to the requirement placed upon ALL TRUSTEES of escrow accounts and trust accounts, wherein the TRUSTEE collects and temporarily holdsfunds belonging to others in which there is a real or potential third party interest. Mishandling such funds bya TRUSTEE, or co-mingling such funds with TRUSTEE's own funds, will land such TRUSTEE in jail quickerthan most anything else a TRUSTEE can do wrong. Ask any attorney or real estate broker or mortgage banker who holds such funds as a TRUSTEE. This provision makes perfectly good sense.

Editor's 2nd note: In all of Sub-Chapter 1 of Title 26 (the Income Tax), the language in Section 1461 aboveIS THE ONLY PLACE which contains language that in any way makes any American citizen LIABLE for the payment of the Income Tax. Please note that ALL withholding required involves only foreigners and foreign corporations (because Congress has the power to tax foreign commerce, but DOES NOT have the power to tax commerce within or between the states, or to tax domestic incomes).

Editor's 3rd note: There can be no doubt that Congress knows how to write statutes in language thatclearly makes someone LIABLE for the Income Tax, and to IMPOSE a tax (the statutes IMPOSE a tax uponTAXABLE INCOME, but TAXABLE INCOME does not include the domestic incomes of Americans livingand working within the 50 states.

Editor's 4th note: Please re-read the definition of "WITHHOLDING AGENT." Does it require any employerto withhold anything from ANY U.S. citizen's domestic income? No, it does not. Yet Dick Simkanin sits inprison because he was "convicted" for failing to withhold taxes from his American citizen employees. Anyinformed jury would have acquitted him. The same holds true for Dentist Elaine Brown, insofar as those charges for failing to withhold from her dental employees are concerned....but she was not allowed by thecorrupt judge to present any LAW as evidence in her own defense. She was RAILROADED and the jury wasmisled, misinformed, misdirected, and LIED TO by the judge. But that is standard practice in federal tax trials.

1:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 7 > SUBCHAPTER IV > Part D > § 666 Prev | Next

§ 666. Requirement of statutorily prescribed procedures to improve effectiveness of child support enforcement

How Current is This?

(a) Types of procedures required
In order to satisfy section 654 (20)(A) of this title, each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness of the program which the State administers under this part:
(A) Procedures described in subsection (b) of this section for the withholding from income of amounts payable as support in cases subject to enforcement under the State plan.
(B) Procedures under which the income of a person with a support obligation imposed by a support order issued (or modified) in the State before January 1, 1994, if not otherwise subject to withholding under subsection (b) of this section, shall become subject to withholding as provided in subsection (b) of this section if arrearages occur, without the need for a judicial or administrative hearing.

5:03 AM  
Anonymous Kenneth H. said...

I have a webpage that some of you may be interested in.

Nicklas Arthur on the mark of the beast

8:13 AM  
Anonymous Julie H said...

Fred wrote: "... withholding required involves only foreigners and foreign corporations (because Congress has the power to tax foreign commerce, but DOES NOT have the power to tax commerce within or between the states or to tax domestic incomes).”

I’ve wondered about the implications of the tax codes and the limitations of the jurisdiction of the illegal government for some time.

Logic follows:

Codes 1441 – 1446 define the withholding agents for FOREIGN AND ALIEN individuals and corporations.

The Supreme Court definition of the jurisdictional area of the corporate United States is the ten square miles of its incorporation area defined as the District of Columbia and its territories and possessions.

Hence it follows that all states outside the District, the possessions and territories are alien residents and foreign corporations.

If they must define the People and the corporations outside their jurisdiction as foreign and alien in order to legalize and enforce the requirement to file and the ultimate COLLECTION OF TAXES FROM ALIEN RESIDENTS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS then…

It follows that the residents of the Fifty States comprising the Union and the corporations located within those states are in fact remnants of the currently non functioning Republic government of the United States set aside during the coupe de taunt of 1933.

Since the legal government the Republic of the United States stopped functioning all legislation passed from that date on would not be applicable to citizens of the Republic.

Hence the Fifty states still unified under the defunct Republic could in fact reconstitute their REPUBLIC form of government by calling forth an election in each state for the purpose of selecting representatives of the Republic who would then set up the reinstated Republic government.

Could the solution be so simple as citizens of the Republic (remember aliens to the UNITED STATES) selecting a new location for the seat of central government, call for an election within each state for the purpose of selecting representatives of the Republic government and RE-declaring all territories outside the jurisdictional area of the corporate UNITED STATES as the territory of the Republic.

This is where that possible solution gets VERY interesting…
The corporate UNITED STATES has in fact collateralized alien residents and foreign corporations to secure fraudulent loans and further obligated the alien residents and foreign corporations to be taxed for purposes of paying off the national debt.

Ask yourself this… Would Italy or Russia or Peru or China tax its residents to pay for debts incurred by the UNITED STATES corporate government?

I think not.

So in closing I would like to add THANK YOU ED BROWN!

You have provided a vehicle of discourse amongst the citizens of the Republic and it is up to them to take back their country which I believe is possible through the reconstituted Courts of the Republic!

I came to this conclusion and I would very much appreciate the opinion of an uncompromised Constitutional lawyer who is viewing this thread.

In fact I will fire this off to retired Judge Napolitano and see if he will put his mouth where his money is (The Constitution in Exile).

10:39 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you, Ed, for spending another week in self-imposed self-detention. You are sure making our job easy!

~ Marshals

11:05 AM  
Blogger Tyler said...

To the Federal Marshal (assuming it's not a fake):

Options: a) Spending one's time in a beautiful castle like home surrounded by friends and loved ones, planning the uprising of the American People; b) In a cold cell of a federal detention centre, surrounded by rapist, murders and thieves...

I'd take the castle and the revolution!

11:40 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home