Complying with the Tax Law
by Larken Rose
So now you've had a crash course (or crash rehash) of the 861 evidence. While the conclusion (that most of us never owed a penny in federal income taxes) is obviously difficult at first to accept, the path leading to that conclusion consists entirely of solid steps.
Read more here.
5 Comments:
OUTSTANDING! Rose Larkin's Research is Irrefutable... As is Aaron Russo's, Bill Benson's, Joe Banister's and Many other's before them.
Thank you all.
I may have found why large corporations insist on including their employees wages as taxable income. Reading the regs at 1.265-1 it says income exempted by law may not be taken as an expense, therefor the corporation would loose all those expenses for labor. Am I wrong?
I have always wondered why companies go along with the IRS, what they have to gain. This is the first time I have found a motive. There it was in my face the entire time.
Yeah, Larken's research was so good that he abandoned 861 before trial, proceeded on a Cheek defense, and was convicted after less than 45 minutes of deliberation.
Sort of like how Thurston Bell thought that 861 was so good that he immediately rolled over when the DOJ sought an injunction against him.
The only advice that Larken could give Ed and Elaine would be something along the lines of "how to survive in federal prison".
I see no proof of anything from JOEY, Except proof that IRS Disinformation Thrives in every crevice of Intellectual Society...
JOEY Probably Wrote the Manual for how to Survive in Federal Prison, at the same time He Helped the IRS formulate the Plan for filling the Federal Prisons.
Thanks Thurston... Educating isn't it Joey?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home