Thursday, February 22, 2007

Complying with the Tax Law



by Larken Rose

So now you've had a crash course (or crash rehash) of the 861 evidence. While the conclusion (that most of us never owed a penny in federal income taxes) is obviously difficult at first to accept, the path leading to that conclusion consists entirely of solid steps.

Read more here.

8 Comments:

Blogger TrueLogic said...

OUTSTANDING! Rose Larkin's Research is Irrefutable... As is Aaron Russo's, Bill Benson's, Joe Banister's and Many other's before them.

Thank you all.

8:17 PM  
Blogger Thurston said...

Larken and Tessa will always be my heros.

They did not believe what I posted and was asking questions about.

The government still has not answered me, but they together proved me more correct than I dared to ever say.

It all started with a question about the certainly taxable U.S. Sources, then lead to the definition of exempt income at 26 C.F.R. 1.861-8T(d)(2)(ii)(A).

It pretty much has remained there since the U.S. Attorney Evan Davis said "it's frivolous because it's frivolous."

How is a section of law friolous?

Because I claimed that it applied to U.S. Citizens?

The judge ruled it applicalbe to citizens when he found against me, so I was enjoined for agreeing with the law and the Judge?

So you Americans who cannot care, when do you want judicial reform? Now? Or later after you have faced the same injustices as we have braved?

8:22 PM  
Blogger KOSMIC said...

I may have found why large corporations insist on including their employees wages as taxable income. Reading the regs at 1.265-1 it says income exempted by law may not be taken as an expense, therefor the corporation would loose all those expenses for labor. Am I wrong?

I have always wondered why companies go along with the IRS, what they have to gain. This is the first time I have found a motive. There it was in my face the entire time.

9:02 PM  
Blogger Joey Smith said...

Yeah, Larken's research was so good that he abandoned 861 before trial, proceeded on a Cheek defense, and was convicted after less than 45 minutes of deliberation.

Sort of like how Thurston Bell thought that 861 was so good that he immediately rolled over when the DOJ sought an injunction against him.

The only advice that Larken could give Ed and Elaine would be something along the lines of "how to survive in federal prison".

10:17 PM  
Blogger TrueLogic said...

I see no proof of anything from JOEY, Except proof that IRS Disinformation Thrives in every crevice of Intellectual Society...

JOEY Probably Wrote the Manual for how to Survive in Federal Prison, at the same time He Helped the IRS formulate the Plan for filling the Federal Prisons.

1:50 AM  
Blogger Thurston said...

There was a half full court that saw my oral arguments.

So Jjoey, you lie when you say that I rolled over.

10:29 PM  
Blogger Thurston said...

You lie in one Joey, you lie in all.

By the way on a Willful failure case the Cheek defense isused to brng the person's understanding of the law into the record. Cheek was the door to 861 for Mr. Rose.

So there is a second lie Joey.

It is going to take more than your empty words to unindict your credibility.

10:32 PM  
Blogger TrueLogic said...

Thanks Thurston... Educating isn't it Joey?

12:55 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

 

SITEMETER