Sunday, September 30, 2007

Concord Monitor Article About Ron Paul


Many awakenings: Ron Paul is as surprised as anyone at the near messianic zeal he inspires

By SARAH LIEBOWITZ
Monitor staff
September 30. 2007 12:07AM

Ron Paul doesn't understand his own success. He didn't know his calls for an end to the Federal Reserve and the Department of Education would draw cheers, that his anti-income tax, anti-foreign intervention and libertarian message would resonate. He was reluctant to run for the Republican presidential nomination, he said yesterday: He was convinced it would take another "generation for education" before his message - rooted in Paul's reading of the Constitution - gained traction.

"I have been just dumbfounded about what's happening," Paul said yesterday in Manchester's Veteran's Park, where roughly 500 sup

porters gathered for a glimpse of the presidential candidate. "I've been talking this way for 30 years. But something, something special is happening." Click here for more.

1 comment:

  1. Important email I received.

    Americans,

    The Bush Administration is on track with its plans to
    attack Iran before George Bush Jr. leaves office
    in 18 months.

    Unfortunately, few Americans think this is probable,
    let alone possible.

    It is both.

    I agree with Scott Ritter and Daniel Ellsberg
    (of "The Pentagon Papers" fame) that this attack
    will have negative consequences on the world and
    American citizens far in excess of 9/11 and the
    Iraq War.

    It could very well be the final nail in the coffin
    of American democracy.

    With that in mind...

    Here are some facts to share with your friends and
    colleagues about the Iran situation to stop this war
    before it starts:

    *** Reality check

    The Bush propagandists are hard at work trying to draw a
    comparison between Nazi Germany and Iran.

    There are a few major problems with their fairy tale.

    For example:

    1. Modern Iran has no history of military aggression

    Fact: Iran has never invaded or attacked another country
    in the Middle East or elsewhere.

    In contrast, the US has savaged Iraq causing the death
    of over 600,000 civilians since 2003 alone.

    In the summer of 2006, Israel bombarded Lebanon in a
    "search for terrorists" killing over 1,000 civilians and causing
    billions of dollars in damage to the country's infrastructure
    (airport, ports, roadways, housing, and factories.)

    In 1980, the US encouraged its ally Saddam Hussein
    to attack Iran and he did with terrible consequences
    for the Iranian people.

    2. Who has nukes?

    Facts:

    a. Iran has no nuclear weapons
    b. Iran lacks the ability to create nuclear weapons
    c. Iran is permitted by international treaty to develop
    a nuclear energy program.

    In contrast, the US has the largest nuclear weapons stockpile
    on earth and has stated, under the Bush administration,
    its "right" to use them "pre-emptively" at President
    Bush's discretion. The US continues to develop new
    and "improved" nuclear weapons.

    Israel has a well developed nuclear weapons program
    and is the only nuclear power in the Middle East.

    3. The US attacked Iran in the 1980s using Iraq as a surrogate

    Saddam Hussein, who was put in power by the US, was supported
    in his invasion of Iran with billions of dollars in US weapons
    shipped to him by Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr. and coordinated
    by people including Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney.

    Over 300,000 Iranians were killed in this US-funded war and
    over 500,000 were wounded.

    It was during the US supported-Iraq attack on Iran that the
    US transferred chemical and biological weapons technology
    to Iraq. There is evidence that the Bush family commercially
    profited from these arms exports.

    4. The US installed and maintained a tyranny in Iran
    that operated from 1953 to 1979.

    In 1953, the US and CIA with help from the UK engineered a violent
    overthrow of the country's democratically elected government and
    then supported a brutal, anti-democratic dictator in Iran - the
    so called "Shah of Iran" - who jailed thousands of dissidents and
    engaged in vicious torture.

    *** Military considerations

    1. Iran is the 18th largest country in the world by size - the area
    of the UK, France and German combined.

    2. Iran has over 70 million people - three times the population of
    Iraq

    3. The Iranian military

    Unlike Iraq, which lost a war with the US in 1990 and was
    militarily attacked non-stop up to the US invasion in 2003,
    Iran has had approximately 20 uninterrupted years to
    build and refine it defense capacity

    4. Iranians are as patriotic about their country as
    Americans are about theirs and will stand and fight
    as they proved when attacked by Iraq in 1980.

    When fighting Iraq, Iran used every human and
    material recourse it had including "human waves"
    of poorly armed and equipped suicide troops
    who overcame the Iraqis with their sheer numbers.

    We have 160,000 troops in the region. The Iranians
    have 70,000,000 people and they will be fighting
    on their home turf for their homeland.

    5. Invaders are always at a disadvantage no
    matter how technologically advanced.

    Invaders who have a supply line many thousands of
    miles long are at an extreme disadvantage.

    6. Iranian tactics and operations are up-to-date
    and formidable.

    Iranian-trained militias in Lebanon were able
    to counter an all out attack on Lebanon by the
    US-equipped Israel army and air force and compel
    the Israelis to retreat and agree to a cease-fire.

    7. Potential Iranian responses to a US attack

    Iran in a counterattack has the option of:

    a. closing the Straits of Hormuz (through which over 20%
    of the world's oil passes),
    b. attacking Israel, and/or
    c. attacking US military installations in Iraq

    None of these operations would be difficult or expensive to
    carry out.

    However, the financial and human consequences could
    be extreme.

    Oil, already at $80 a barrel could, according to Wall Street
    analysts, hit $200 per barrel - or more - with a doubling of
    current gasoline prices.

    Thousands of civilians and military personnel could be
    killed and wounded in a matter of days.

    *** Is war with Iran possible?

    Yes.

    1. Bush has the legal authority

    Bush secured the legal authority to attack any country
    any time for any reason post 9/11 and pre-Iraq invasion.
    Congress has never taken this power back from him.
    They need to do it. NOW.

    2. The troops, weapons and plans needed are already in place

    The so called "surge" has put many extra thousands
    of US troops and equipment into the region. (For the
    geographically challenged Iran is right next to Iraq.)

    3. The propaganda war has already started

    A very well funded and well organized propaganda
    operation - Freedom's Watch - staffed by former
    Bush administration officials has set up in Washington DC
    with a multi-million dollar budget to "sell" war with
    Iran to the American people.

    Sadly, they are doing an excellent job and few
    Americans are aware of how they are being conned
    (again.)

    *** Who benefits from attacking Iran?

    The people who will benefit from an attack on Iran
    are very same people who benefited - and continue
    to benefit - from the invasion of Iraq:

    1. Oil companies - the price of their product will
    skyrocket

    2. Weapons makers - including the Carlyle Group,
    which the Bush family owns a major stake in.

    3. Virulent Anti-Muslim and Arab zealots in Israel and elsewhere
    - and the idiots in America who support them

    4. Insiders with the financial resources place "bets" on the
    war: buy gold, buy oil, short the US dollar etc.

    5. Anti-democratic forces in the United States

    About this last point...

    Starting with the Reagan administration and continuing
    unabated through the Clinton administration and
    accelerating after 9/11, the executive branch of the United
    States government has methodically been:

    1. Destroying traditional rights and protections guaranteed
    to US citizens by the Constitution

    2. Creating a police state apparatus designed to silence
    and suppress dissent with maximum force.

    Simply by declaring you an "enemy combatant" or
    someone who "supports" a declared enemy, you can be
    arrested and held without charge indefinitely and without
    the right to counsel.

    This means that should the Bush administration engage
    in a war of naked aggression against Iran openly killing
    thousands of innocent Iranian civilians with bombardment,
    including nuclear attacks, the very act of speaking out about
    the immorality of such an attack could land you in jail
    for the rest of your life or until such time the President
    of the United States decides to release you.

    Does this sound improbable?

    It's not.

    Imagine this possible scenario.

    The US attacks Iran.

    Iran counterattacks hitting Israel and US troops
    in Iraq.

    Underestimating the capacity of the Iranians to
    defend themselves, the US finds its troops pinned
    down in Iraq by a military that is capable of killing
    them by the thousands.

    What would the US do if, in yet another Bush
    blunder, Bush put thousands of US troops at
    the immediate risk of being killed?

    How would the average uneducated American,
    coming late to the story, react to the news that
    hundreds of US servicemen and women were
    being killed daily?

    Would this give Bush the green light for what
    his administration has been creating the
    military doctrine for: a unilateral, first strike
    nuclear attack?

    You bet it would and in the perverse world of
    the Bush family and its allies, it's possible they
    may welcome the chance to finally let that
    particular genie out of the bottle.

    Bottom line:

    Once a military attack against Iran gets started,
    there is no imaginable positive outcome and potential
    negative outcomes are worse than anything any
    of us have seen in our lifetime.

    For example:

    * The reputation and moral standing of the US, which has
    already been smeared by the blatant criminality of the Bush
    administration, will be ruined, perhaps beyond repair

    * Thousands of civilians and troops - perhaps tens
    or even hundred of thousands - could be killed or
    wounded. There could be casualties in ONE DAY that
    dwarf all the casualties in Iraq since the invasion.

    * The world economy will be thrown into a tailspin
    and the US economy, the world's most dependent
    on oil, will be hit especially hard.

    * Underlying financial instability caused by a culture
    of corruption and fraud (Enron, WorldCom, sub-prime
    mortgages etc.) will be further strained perhaps
    to the breaking point.

    * China and Russian, two very formidable potential
    enemies with human, natural and technological
    resources equivalent to the US, may decide (if
    they already haven't) that they need to join forces
    to "check" US power and may begin to do so in
    an aggressive way.

    Again, this is all great news for the oil companies,
    the weapons makers, the anti-Muslim and Arab zealots,
    the opponents of civil rights and the Constitution.
    and plugged in Wall Street operators.

    It will be a disaster for American citizens.

    Disasters for average Americans is what the Bush family
    has been about for four generations now:

    1. The great grandfather *Samuel Bush* was Woodrow Wilson's
    liaison to the weapon's industry and profited mightily in that
    role. He was one of a handful of architects "present at creation"
    of the modern military-industrial complex which has
    steadily bled the US financially and morally for private
    profit for decades.

    2. The grandfather *Prescott Bush* was US banker to the
    Nazis, helping them before, during, and after World
    War II with their financial operations.

    3. Bush Sr. was behind the Iran-Contra operation
    which illegally sent arms to Iran and siphoned
    the profits for personal gain and to fund terrorist
    operations in Central America. He also worked
    with the Bin Laden family and others to fund the
    so called Afghani resistance which became the Taliban
    and al Queda.

    4. And finally, George W. Bush, who in seven years has done more
    lasting harm to to the United State than any group of external
    enemies, real or imagined, could ever do.

    Undermining fundamental America values and
    strengthening US enemies been a lucrative business
    for the Bush Family for four generations now.

    *** Action items to stop the coming war

    Let your friends and colleagues - and the media and
    your local representatives know that:

    1. You don't buy the Bush administration's anti-Iranian propaganda

    2. A war against Iran would be potentially catastrophic,
    much worse than the current disaster in Iraq

    3. Advocacy for this war as practiced by
    Bush administration front groups like Freedom's Watch
    is against American interests and needs to be exposed

    4. Bush needs to have the war powers granted to him
    post 9/11 taken away and taken away now.

    Brasscheck TV will be posting a number of new videos
    about the impending war with Iran.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.