Saturday, February 24, 2007

ShowEdTheLaw.com Gets 21,853 Unique Visitors On Thursday!



ShowEdTheLaw.com breaks previous record set by EdBrown.org.*

Digg.com helps to Publicize Ed’s $1,000,000 Offer!

When Ed raised the stakes to find the law by offering up as reward commercial property he owns with an estimated value of 1.2 million dollars. The online community picked up on it very rapidly, a member at Digg.com initialized the first digg and the story was launched into a hyper-frenzied state of internet popularity! Overnight website traffic went from 469 unique visitors on Wednesday to 21,853 unique visitors on Thursday.

Read more here.

*May have been a tie. We don't have the exact figure from EdBrown.org. Looks like a Digg brings in about 20,000 visitors and then they all disappear and go back to watching American Idol. But at least it makes them think for a minute. Good work Casey Lee Cobb and lolipopfailure.

UPDATE: Appears that ShowEdTheLaw.com did break the record. He got over 21,000 while EdBrown.org got just under 21,000. Good work guys.

8 Comments:

Blogger Bleap said...

If after all that you believe just 5% is truth and you clearly realize all the money stolen from americans paychecks it is then your DUTY as an american to stop paying this income tax on labor. You must do whatever you can to stop it. File exempt, Claim 100% refund, Stop all withholding from you pay. That is the only way to fix this problem. Don't let government tell you we need a flat tax or fair tax or national sales tax. The constitution tells the government how to lay a direct tax and there is a darn good reason it was written that way. It keeps government in check. Since the 3 branches of government are no longer separate but are in fact one now, there is but one non violent option left. Everyone needs to stand together with Ed Brown and stop all withholding from our payroll checks, our wages and our labor. This is about supporting our families and our country. One last note, The government will not fall apart because it has other options for raising revenue without destroying the working poor in this country. Please become informed and help us end this 80 year old proplem once and for all.

6:53 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

I would like to have clarity on how exactly the 16th Amendment to the Constitution implies taxes upon every "person" when Article 1 Section 9 Clause 4 clearly states that no direct tax can be imposed without apportionment.

This really troubles me to believe that the 16th Amendment overturned a direct Constitutional limitation upon the Congress. In other words how can Congress pass a law, the 16th Amendment, in direct violation to Congress' limitations imposed by Article 1 Section 9 Clause 4 under capitation and direct taxes?

Did the 16th Amendment overturn the capitation and direct tax limitations imposed by the Constitution? Thank you

8:37 AM  
Blogger Joey Smith said...

Merely pointing out again that the $1,000,000 offer is a total sham because the buildings that Ed and Elaine are putting up are subject to forfeiture and lien procedures anyway.

9:45 AM  
Blogger jean allen said...

And I "merely" point out to Joey that the IRS could provide the law and the Browns would walk away. But, Joey (or, whoever you are) you won't acknowledge the fact that there is no law.

Jean Allen
Tuscaloosa, Al.

11:12 AM  
Blogger Joey Smith said...

Because it is not a fact -- it is a LIE.

10:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmmmm, seems like whenever there is a post that mentions the reward for showing the tax law little Joey comes in to try and discredit it claiming there is no money.

Joey - There's a hell of a lot more money available for this challenge that Ed Browns property. How come you always leave that bit of info out of your posts?

We the people foundation has had 50k available for years now. There's also many other individuals who have put up funds for the challenge. Of course you always neglect to mention that.

Joey - For someone who hates the browns, the fair tax movement, this blog, the people posting etc, etc, you sure spend a lot of time here.

I wonder why that is?

Your true colors show blindingly.

As for your constant crap about the 16th amendment... it does not matter if the 16th was ratified or not (not) because its been clearly ruled already that the 16th amendment gives the government NO new taxing powers. What part of NO NEW TAKING POWERS don't you understand?

Here's a question for you Joey:

Why do you hang out on this blog all day long every day?

Why are you afraid to do a radio interview? And yes you are AFRAID to go on the air with your so called facts.

You a pathetic excuse for an American!

2:21 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Wages" is a word of art, and is defined at 26 USC Section 3401(a). If you are a 26 USC Section 3401(c) "Employee" then you are in receipt of "Wages" - and it is taxable. "Employee" = Government Worker and officer in a (Federal) Corporation. So be careful claiming that "Wages" do not constitute taxable income. The real point is that very few Americans receive "Wages", as defined.

3:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The W-2 submitted by your private sector business organization stating that you are in receipt of "Wages" is in error and must be corrected. You do this by filing IRS Form 4852 along with your 1040 (but NOT any W-2's) and get your money back. Review the work at: www.losthorizons.com

3:35 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

 

SITEMETER