tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38588416.post2283416901627643616..comments2023-10-24T05:35:24.823-04:00Comments on SHOW US THE INHERENT LAW: Danny Riley Comments On The Concept/Idea of A Peaceful SolutionThe Freedom Fellowshiphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11788272213603576761noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38588416.post-13370396581880018532007-08-07T02:11:00.000-04:002007-08-07T02:11:00.000-04:00Agreed.Agreed.TrueLogichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08990980327187383551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38588416.post-72477149785713629082007-08-06T15:28:00.000-04:002007-08-06T15:28:00.000-04:00Well done...a thought-provoking article.There are ...Well done...a thought-provoking article.<BR/><BR/>There are a number of extremely unfortunate and frustrating aspects to this whole situation. Here are a few---<BR/><BR/>1. Marshals (or other law enforcement folks) are not going to show Ed & Elaine the Law in question...because they don't have the desire to do so, much less the expertise to even attempt it. The misapplied 26 USC, Subtitle A, Chapter 1 is so lengthy, convoluted and confusing that most BARflies (attorneys) have a tough time trying to explain it.<BR/><BR/>2. Non-Peace Officer Govt representatives are not going to "show the Law" because it is not in their best interests to do so...and they don't care about the controversy.<BR/><BR/>3. On April 15 of this year, every "taxpayer" in this nation should have refused (in the name of Ed & Elaine) to submit a 1040...but they didn't refuse. Had they done so, someone in the Govt would have been forced to come forward & "show us the Law".<BR/><BR/>4. Whoever represents Ed & Elaine in the U.S. House of Representatives should have come to their home...to find out first-hand (not by hearsay) what their complaint is about. That person should be thoroughly ashamed of himself/herself. [I realize full well that Reps cannot visit every individual in their Districts, but this is a unique and dire situation.]<BR/><BR/>THERE ARE A NUMBER of possible (but, admittedly, NOT probable) peaceful solutions to this scenario. [Remember, I said "possible", not probable.] Here are a few---<BR/><BR/>1. Someone from Treasury could be dispatched to Plainfield to "show the Law". [Highly unlikely, but if the Govt was of a mind to do so, it is possible.]<BR/><BR/>2. More likely, Ed & Elaine's Congressional Rep could come to Plainfield and do the same. This would require a lot of pressure being put on him/her. [Has anyone explored this possibility? I say that despite what I said in # 2 above.]<BR/><BR/>3. Ed & Elaine could surrender peaceably based on this reasoning: perhaps it is better to live and work for restoration of the Republic (even in prison) than it is to die. [Frankly, I would probably do exactly as Ed & Elaine are doing now, but we're talking "what is possible" here. No matter what the Browns say, surrender is "possible"; but, of course, it takes the will to do it.]<BR/><BR/>4. The Marshals could come to their senses and recognize that they're making war on a peaceful couple who only are saying that they will defend themselves...and then the Marshals could quit. [Unfortunately, even if that possibility came about, they would be replaced with different Marshals.]<BR/><BR/>5. The People of this country could stop fearing their SERVANT Govt and boycott it AT EVERY LEVEL in the name of Ed & Elaine. [Highly unlikely, but "possible".]<BR/><BR/>So, what are we left with? Except for food for thought, it seems that we're back to square one.<BR/><BR/>BUT...<BR/><BR/>perhaps we should find out who Ed & Elaine's Congressional Rep is and inundate that person with emails, phone calls, letters, videos (posted on the web), etc. DEMANDING that he/she "show Ed & Elaine the Law", and show it in detail, with all the exclusions, exceptions, and gobbledeegook phrases ["Except as provided for in section 61...", "Except as otherwise provided...(where???)] etc. EXPLAINED.<BR/><BR/>OR---<BR/><BR/>perhaps we should attempt to convince Ed & Elaine (I know this would be tough) that it is better to be a live martyr than a dead one. Consider Ghandi, Mandela, and others who spent time in prison---look what they accomplished. [I have a tough time with this one because, as I said, I would probably do exactly as the Browns are doing. Nevertheless, unless you are terminally ill or being tortured, living makes more sense than dying.]<BR/><BR/>Obviously, there are no easy answers to this problem.<BR/><BR/>My main disappointment is with the adult American public in general. We could force the Govt's hand if only we would boycott on a massive scale.<BR/><BR/>Sincerely,<BR/>Scott<BR/><BR/>http://individualsovereignty.blogspot.com/Scott Haleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14822015880980374198noreply@blogger.com