Thank God for the Jury, but this case proves nothing. It does not prove in the eyes of the court or of the common person that there is not law. 1 the law still was not allowed in the court room. 2 The jury ruled that Cryer believed what he was saying and so the fillfullness test failed to convict him. 3 The case was starting to get too much press and the government simply let this one go. Without admitting one way or the other.
It may be a win for Cryer but the formula for extorting income tax on labor is still in place and this case changes nothing.
Read more here.
Thank God for the Jury, but this case proves nothing. It does not prove in the eyes of the court or of the common person that there is not law.
ReplyDelete1 the law still was not allowed in the court room.
2 The jury ruled that Cryer believed what he was saying and so the fillfullness test failed to convict him.
3 The case was starting to get too much press and the government simply let this one go. Without admitting one way or the other.
It may be a win for Cryer but the formula for extorting income tax on labor is still in place and this case changes nothing.