Sunday, March 11, 2007

Unconstitutional - The War on Our Civil Liberties

5 comments:

  1. TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 85 > § 1361 Prev | Next

    § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty
    How Current is This?

    The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 9-2.000
    AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY IN
    CRIMINAL DIVISION MATTERS/PRIOR APPROVALS



    9-2.159 Refusal of Government Departments and Agencies to Produce Evidence

    It is the responsibility of the Department of Justice to enforce the law vigorously and it cannot abdicate this duty

    because of possible embarrassment to other agencies of the government. Situations may arise where substantial reasons of

    national security, foreign policy or the like may require the Department to abandon an investigation, forego litigation, or

    seek dismissal of a case. However, such action should be taken only after the most careful consideration of all of the

    relevant facts and then only with the personal approval of the Assistant Attorney General (AAG) in charge of the Division

    having responsibility for the case.


    1. In no event should the United States Attorney accept the opinion or representation of the agency that such records

    or witnesses cannot be made available without determining all of the specific facts upon which the agency relies to support

    its refusal.

    2. If the United States Attorney is not satisfied that the facts justify the refusal, he/she should so advise the

    agency and seek to procure the evidence requested of the agency.

    3. If the United States Attorney concurs that there are sufficient and valid reasons to support the agency's refusal

    to produce the necessary evidence, he/she should advise the AAG in charge of the division having jurisdiction over the

    subject matter of the case of his/her conclusion. That AAG, after consultation with the Deputy Attorney General, will

    authorize the United States Attorney, if necessary and appropriate, to terminate the investigation, forego the litigation, or

    dismiss the case. A full statement of the facts supporting the conclusion of the United States Attorney should be set forth

    in the correspondence to the appropriate AAG.

    The United States Attorney should also apprise the appropriate AAG of any incidents coming to his/her attention where

    he/she believes any agency of the federal government is not cooperating in his/her efforts to obtain the full disclosure of

    the facts to enable him/her to make an intelligent judgment as to whether the agency's refusal to produce requested evidence

    is justified.

    ReplyDelete
  3. President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control
    President Bush is out of control

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree, We will not stand for this crap. Ed is Justified. Those who don't understand or who support evil with a blind eye are the real enemy. We must educate the masses and take up arms against all injustice. Not just the tax, courts or military. We must became the peacekeepers named in the Bible.

    ReplyDelete
  5. good video... thanks for the Post.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.